itical study. Their arguments become "absolutely powerless against
the modern historical interpretation of the Bible; and the more that
interpretation underlies the teaching of the young, the more certain
are those attacks to die a natural death."[37]
There are, indeed, few Old Testament scholars who would not indorse the
testimony of Professor A. S. Peake, given in a paper on "Permanent
Results of Biblical Criticism," read before the Fourth Methodist
Ecumenical Conference: "Speaking for myself, I may truthfully say that
my sense of the value of Scripture, my interest in it, my attachment to
it, have been almost indefinitely enhanced by the new attitude and new
mode of study which criticism has brought to us."
NOTES ON CHAPTER III
[1] Old Testament Criticism and the Christian Church, p. 1.
[2] The Integrity of Scripture, p. 1.
[3] The History of the Higher Criticism of the New Testament, p. 85.
[4] Old Testament Criticism and the Christian Church, p. 47.
{108}
[5] General Introduction to the Old Testament: The Text, pp. 162, 163.
[6] J. G. Eichhorn, Einleitung in das Alte Testament, Preface to Second
Edition.
[7] The Elements of the Higher Criticism, pp. 12, 13.
[8] Christ and Criticism, Preface.
[9] J. P. Peters, The Old Testament and the New Scholarship, p. 87.
[10] L. W. Munhall, Anti-Higher Criticism, p. 9. For a discriminating
study of the theological and philosophical bias of the more
representative Old Testament critics, see Bibliotheca Sacra, January,
1912, pp. 1ff.
[11] The Bible and Modern Criticism, p. 19.
[12] The Problem of the Old Testament, pp. 7, 8.
[13] Some of these concessions are enumerated in J. E. McFadyen, Old
Testament Criticism and the Christian Church, pp. 15ff. The Problem of
the Old Testament, by James Orr, is often quoted as overthrowing
entirely the positions of modern criticism regarding the authorship of
the Pentateuch. If, however, one reads Orr's summary of the chief
results of his own critical investigation (pp. 371ff.), the question
may well be asked, Why should he be considered less of a higher critic
than, for example, Wellhausen?
[14] The Origin and Permanent Value of the Old Testament, p. 30.
[15] Old Testament Criticism and the Christian Church, p. 143.
[16] Even those who question the existence of four independent
documents assume the activity of at least four different hands.
[17] James Hastings, Dictionary of the Bible, Vol. IV
|