, p. 151.
[18] See above, pp. 30ff.
[19] The Highest Critics vs. The Higher Critics, pp. 7, 8.
{109}
[20] Acts 3. 24. The passage in the mind of the apostle seems to be 2
Sam. 7. 11-16.
[21] Heb. 4. 7.
[22] Psa. 95.
[23] The origin of the designations Moses = Pentateuch, Samuel = books
of Samuel, David = book of Psalms, must be explained, and can be
explained; but as the mention of Samuel and David shows, it cannot
always rest upon the fact of authorship, whatever the popular idea may
have been.
[24] James Hastings, Dictionary of the Bible, Vol. IV, p. 151.
[25] Introduction to the Old Testament, p. 76.
[26] See above, p. 55.
[27] Mark 13. 32.
[28] M. S. Terry, Moses and the Prophets, p. 194.
[29] C. A. Briggs, General Introduction to the Study of Holy Scripture,
p. 26.
[30] Quoted in J. E. McFadyen, Old Testament Criticism and the
Christian Church, p. 253.
[31] Moses has, indeed, been removed by some investigators to the realm
of myth, but not upon the basis of conclusions reached by the
legitimate modern criticism.
[32] C. F. Kent, A History of the Hebrew People, Vol. I, pp. 44, 45.
[33] Prophets, English translation, Vol. II, p. 1.
[34] C. F. Kent, A History of the Hebrew People, Vol. I, p. 167.
[35] Introduction to the Literature of the Old Testament, pp. viii, ix.
[36] Revelation and the Bible, p. 61.
[37] J. E. McFadyen, Old Testament Criticism and the Christian Church,
p. 136.
{110}
CHAPTER IV
THE OLD TESTAMENT AND ARCHEOLOGY
A century ago the student of the world's history found it exceedingly
difficult, if not impossible, to paint for himself a clear picture of
events antedating B.C. 400. Concerning earlier periods, he was, aside
from the Old Testament, practically without records that could claim
contemporaneousness with the events recorded. But, one hundred years
ago, men had commenced to test every statement, be it historical, or
scientific, or theological, by severe canons of criticism, and if it
could not stand the test, it was speedily rejected. One result of this
tendency was to reject historical statements of the Bible when they
could not be corroborated by reliable extra-biblical records. The
nineteenth century has wrought a marvelous change. The Old Testament
is no longer the "lone Old Testament," at the mercy of the scientific
investigator. The historian and the Bible student now have at their
command literary treasures almost
|