FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   1317  
1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   1341   1342   >>   >|  
rights of individuals" in the ceded territory. Amongst the inviolable "rights" was that of holding slaves, as Mr. Leigh contended. I regret, that, in replying to him, you did not make use of the fact, that all the members of Congress from Virginia voted in favor of the Ordinance, which abolished slavery in the North-West Territory; and this too, notwithstanding, that, in the Act of 1784, by which she ceded the North-West Territory to the Confederacy, she provided, that the "citizens of Virginia" in the said Territory, many of whom held slaves, should "be protected in the enjoyment of their rights." This fact furnishes striking evidence that at, or about, the time of the cession by Virginia of her portion of the District of Columbia, her statesmen believed, that the right to hold slaves in those portions of our country under the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress, was not beyond the reach of the controlling power of Congress.] I will, however, suppose it true, that Virginia and Maryland would not have made the cessions in question, had they foreseen, that Congress would abolish slavery in the District of Columbia:--and yet, I affirm, that it would be the duty of Congress to abolish it. Had there been State Prisons in the territory, at the time Congress acquired jurisdiction over it, and had Congress immediately opened their doors, and turned loose hundreds of depraved and bloody criminals, there would indeed have been abundant occasion for complaint. But, had the exercise of its power in the premises extended no farther than to the liberation of such convicts, as, on a re-examination of their cases, were found to be clearly guiltless of the crimes charged upon them; the sternest justice could not have objected to such an occasion for the rejoicing of mercy. And are not the thousands in the District, for whose liberation Congress is besought, unjustly deprived of their liberty? Not only are they guiltless, but they are even unaccused of such crimes, as in the judgment of any, justly work a forfeiture of liberty. And what do Virginia and Maryland ask? Is it, that Congress shall resubject to their control those thousands of deeply wronged men? No--for this Congress cannot do. They ask, that Congress shall fulfil the tyrant wishes of these States. They ask, that the whole people of the United States--those who hate, as well as those who love slavery, shall, by their representatives, assume the guilty and awful responsibili
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   1317  
1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339   1340   1341   1342   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Congress

 

Virginia

 
Territory
 

slavery

 

District

 

rights

 

slaves

 

occasion

 

liberty

 

abolish


liberation

 
guiltless
 
crimes
 

thousands

 
jurisdiction
 
Maryland
 

Columbia

 

States

 

territory

 

charged


United

 

people

 

premises

 

extended

 

exercise

 

guilty

 

complaint

 

farther

 

representatives

 
assume

convicts

 

examination

 
unaccused
 

judgment

 

justly

 
deeply
 

control

 
wronged
 

forfeiture

 
deprived

rejoicing

 

wishes

 

objected

 
justice
 

resubject

 

tyrant

 
responsibili
 

unjustly

 

besought

 
fulfil