FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1315   1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339  
1340   1341   1342   1343   1344   1345   1346   1347   1348   1349   1350   1351   1352   1353   1354   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   >>   >|  
that "a progressive system of improvement will be introduced, that will ultimately revolutionize our civil institutions," they admit, that the prohibition of "intelligence" to the slaves is the settled and necessary policy of slavery, and not, as you would have us believe, a temporary expedient occasioned by the present "agitation of this subject of abolition." 5th. Slavery--the system, which forbids marriage and the reading of the Bible--does of necessity turn its subjects into heathens. A Report of the Synod of South Carolina and Georgia, made five years ago, says: "Who could credit it, that in these years of revival and benevolent effort--that, in this Christian Republic, there are over two millions of human beings in the condition of heathen, and in some respects in a worse condition? They may be justly considered the heathen of this Christian country, and will bear comparison with heathen in any country in the world." I will finish what I have to say on this point of "moral preparation" for freedom, with the remark, that the history of slavery in no country warrants your implication, that slaves acquire such "moral preparation." The British Parliament substituted an apprenticeship for slavery with the express design, that it should afford a "moral preparation" for freedom. And yet, if you will read the reports of late visitors to the British West Indies, you will find, that the planters admit, that they made no use of the advantages of the apprenticeship to prepare their servants for liberty. Their own gain--not the slaves'--was their ruling motive, during the term of the apprenticeship, as well as preceding it. Another of your charges is, _that the abolitionists "have increased the rigors of legislation against slaves in most if not all the slave States_." And suppose, that our principles and measures have occasioned this evil--are they therefore wrong?--and are we, therefore, involved in sin? The principles and measures of Moses and Aaron were the occasion of a similar evil. Does it follow, that those principles and measures were wrong, and that Moses and Aaron were responsible for the sin of Pharaoh's increased oppressiveness? The truth, which Jesus Christ preached on the earth, is emphatically peace: but its power on the depravity of the human heart made it the occasion of division and violence. That depravity was the guilty cause of the division and violence. The truth was but the innocent occasion of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1315   1316   1317   1318   1319   1320   1321   1322   1323   1324   1325   1326   1327   1328   1329   1330   1331   1332   1333   1334   1335   1336   1337   1338   1339  
1340   1341   1342   1343   1344   1345   1346   1347   1348   1349   1350   1351   1352   1353   1354   1355   1356   1357   1358   1359   1360   1361   1362   1363   1364   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

slaves

 

country

 
heathen
 

preparation

 

apprenticeship

 

slavery

 

occasion

 

measures

 

principles

 

condition


Christian

 
violence
 
division
 

depravity

 
freedom
 
British
 

increased

 

occasioned

 

system

 

Another


charges

 

preceding

 

policy

 

rigors

 

motive

 

abolitionists

 

legislation

 

planters

 

Indies

 
visitors

advantages

 

prepare

 
States
 

liberty

 

servants

 
ruling
 

settled

 
preached
 

emphatically

 
Christ

oppressiveness

 

introduced

 

guilty

 
innocent
 

progressive

 

improvement

 
Pharaoh
 

involved

 

institutions

 
prohibition