FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291  
1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   >>   >|  
ny subject--moral, political, or religious. 6. I am opposed to the annexation of Texas to the United States. 7. It is undoubtedly inconsistent with the principles of a free state, professing to be governed in its legislation by the principles of freedom, to sanction slavery, in any form, within its jurisdiction. If we have laws in this state which bear this construction, they ought to be repealed. We should extend to our southern brethren, whenever they may have occasion to come among us, all the privileges and immunities enjoyed by our own citizens, and all the rights and privileges guarantied to them by the Constitution of the United States; but they cannot expect of us to depart from the fundamental principles of civil liberty for the purpose of obviating any temporal inconvenience which they may experience. These are my views upon the topics proposed for my consideration. They are the views which I have always entertained, (at least ever since I have been awakened to their vast importance,) and which I have always supported, so far as I could, by my vote in Congress; and if, in any respect, my answers have not been sufficiently explicit, it will afford me pleasure to reply to any other questions which you may think proper to propose. I am, Sir, very respectfully, Your friend and fellow citizen, WILLIAM SPRAGUE." Oliver Johnson, Esq., Cor. Sec. R.I.A.S. Society. APPENDIX C. The abolitionists in Connecticut petitioned the Legislature of that state at its late session on several subjects deemed by them proper for legislative action. In answer to these petitions-- 1. The law known as the "Black Act" or the "Canterbury law"--under which Miss Crandall was indicted and tried--was repealed, except a single provision, which is not considered objectionable. 2. The right to _trial by jury_ was secured to persons who are claimed as slaves. 3. Resolutions were passed asserting the power of Congress to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia, and recommending that it be done as soon as it can be, "consistently with the _best good_ of the _whole country_."(!) 4. Resolutions were passed protesting against the annexation of Texas to the Union. 5. Resolutions were passed asserting the right of petition as inalienable--condemning Mr. Patton's resolution of Dec. 21, 1837 as an invasion of the rights of the pe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1267   1268   1269   1270   1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291  
1292   1293   1294   1295   1296   1297   1298   1299   1300   1301   1302   1303   1304   1305   1306   1307   1308   1309   1310   1311   1312   1313   1314   1315   1316   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

principles

 

Resolutions

 
passed
 

privileges

 

repealed

 

asserting

 

proper

 

rights

 

Congress

 

slavery


States

 
annexation
 
United
 

Canterbury

 
petitions
 
Johnson
 

Crandall

 

religious

 

indicted

 

answer


petitioned

 

Legislature

 

Society

 

Connecticut

 

APPENDIX

 

opposed

 

abolitionists

 

session

 

legislative

 
action

deemed

 

single

 
subjects
 

objectionable

 

petition

 
protesting
 

country

 
inalienable
 

condemning

 
invasion

Patton

 

resolution

 

consistently

 
persons
 

claimed

 

slaves

 
secured
 

considered

 

Oliver

 
political