FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  
osition, had it not been occasionally questioned. The truth of the assertion, however, is too obvious to admit of argument--and we believe HAS NEVER BEEN DISPUTED BY PERSONS WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE CONSTITUTION." OBJECTIONS TO THE FOREGOING CONCLUSIONS CONSIDERED. We now proceed to notice briefly the main arguments that have been employed in Congress, and elsewhere against the power of Congress to abolish slavery in the District. One of the most plausible is; that "the conditions on which Maryland and Virginia ceded the District to the United States, would be violated, if Congress should abolish slavery there." The reply to this is, that Congress had no power to _accept_ a cession coupled with conditions restricting that "power of exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District," which was given it by the constitution. To show the futility of the objection, we insert here the acts of cession. The cession of Maryland was made in November, 1788, and is as follows: "An act to cede to Congress a district of ten miles square in this state for the seat of the government of the United States." "Be it enacted, by the General Assembly of Maryland, that the representatives of this state in the House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States, appointed to assemble at New-York, on the first Wednesday of March next, be, and they are hereby authorized and required on the behalf of this state, to cede to the Congress of the United States, any district in this state, not exceeding ten miles square, which the Congress may fix upon, and accept for the seat of government of the United States." Laws of Md., v. 2., c. 46. The cession of Virginia was made on the 3d of December, 1788, in the following words: "Be it enacted by the General Assembly, That a tract of country, not exceeding ten miles square, or any lesser quantity, to be located within the limits of the State, and in any part thereof, as Congress may, by law, direct, shall be, and the same is hereby forever ceded and relinquished to the Congress and Government of the United States, in full and absolute right, and exclusive jurisdiction, as well of soil, as of persons residing or to reside thereon, pursuant to the tenor and effect of the eighth section of the first article of the government of the constitution of the United States." But were there no provisos to these acts? The Maryland act had _none_. The Virginia act had this p
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569  
570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Congress

 
States
 

United

 

cession

 
Maryland
 

square

 
District
 

Virginia

 

government

 

accept


constitution

 

abolish

 

slavery

 

exclusive

 

exceeding

 

conditions

 

district

 
enacted
 

General

 

Assembly


authorized
 

required

 
behalf
 
Wednesday
 

December

 

relinquished

 

Government

 

absolute

 
forever
 

thereof


direct

 
jurisdiction
 

thereon

 

pursuant

 

eighth

 

reside

 

residing

 

persons

 

provisos

 

assemble


effect

 

located

 

section

 

limits

 

quantity

 
article
 

country

 
lesser
 

futility

 

CONSTITUTION