FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610  
611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   >>   >|  
ct for the consideration of those charged with the general administration of the government_." Cong. Reg. vol. 1. p. 310, 11. But these are only the initiatory absurdities of this "good faith _implied_." The thirty-six senators aptly illustrate the principle, that error not only conflicts with truth, but is generally at issue with itself. For if it would be a violation of "good faith" to Maryland and Virginia, for Congress to abolish slavery in the District, it would be _equally_ a violation for Congress to do it _with the consent_, or even at the earnest and unanimous petition of the people of the District: yet for years it has been the southern doctrine, that if the people of the District demand of Congress relief in this respect, it has power, as their local legislature, to grant it, and by abolishing slavery there, carry out the will of the citizens. But now new light has broken in! The optics of the thirty-six have pierced the millstone with a deeper insight, and discoveries thicken faster than they can be telegraphed! Congress has no power, O no, not a modicum, to help the slaveholders of the District, however loudly they may clamor for it. The southern doctrine, that Congress is to the District a mere local Legislature to do its pleasure, is tumbled from the genitive into the vocative! Hard fate--and that too at the hands of those who begat it! The reasonings of Messrs. Pinckney, Wise, and Leigh, are now found to be wholly at fault, and the chanticleer rhetoric of Messrs. Glascock and Garland stalks featherless and crest-fallen. For, Mr. Clay's resolution sweeps by the board all those stereotyped common-places, as "Congress a local Legislature," "consent of the District," "bound to consult the wishes of the District," &c. &c., which for the last two sessions of Congress have served to eke out scanty supplies. It declares, that _as slavery existed in Maryland and Virginia at the time of the cession, and as it still continues in both those states, it could not be abolished in the District without a violation of 'that good faith_,' &c. But let us see where this principle of the _thirty-six_ will lead us. If "implied faith" to Maryland and Virginia _restrains_ Congress from the abolition of slavery in the District, it _requires_ Congress to do in the District what those states have done within their bounds, i.e., restrain _others_ from abolishing it. Upon the same principle Congress is _bound_, by the doctrine of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610  
611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Congress
 

District

 

slavery

 

violation

 

principle

 

thirty

 
Maryland
 

doctrine

 

Virginia

 

abolishing


people
 

Messrs

 

Legislature

 
implied
 
consent
 
southern
 

states

 
sweeps
 

common

 

places


resolution

 

stereotyped

 

featherless

 

Pinckney

 

reasonings

 
wholly
 

fallen

 
stalks
 

Garland

 

chanticleer


rhetoric

 

Glascock

 

restrains

 

abolition

 
requires
 

restrain

 
bounds
 

abolished

 

served

 

scanty


sessions

 

wishes

 

supplies

 
continues
 

cession

 
declares
 
existed
 

consult

 
millstone
 
abolish