FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657  
658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   >>   >|  
itutional health and vigor to effectuate so desirable an object, and to remove from us a stigma with which our enemies will never fail to upbraid us, nor our consciences to reproach us?" Mr. Faulkner, in a speech before the Virginia House of Delegates, Jan. 20, 1832, said: "The idea of a gradual emancipation and removal of the slaves from this commonwealth, is coeval with the declaration of our independence from the British yoke. When Virginia stood sustained in her legislation by the pure and philosophic intellect of Pendleton, by the patriotism of Mason and Lee, by the searching vigor and sagacity of Wythe, and by the all-embracing, all-comprehensive genius of Thomas Jefferson! Sir, it was a committee composed of those five illustrious men, who, in 1777, submitted to the general assembly of this state, then in session, _a plan for the gradual emancipation of the slaves of this commonwealth_." Hon. Benjamin Watkins Leigh, late United States' senator from Virginia, in his letters to the people of Virginia, in 1832, signed Appomattox, p. 43, says: "I thought, till very lately, that it was known to every body that during the revolution, _and for many years after, the abolition of slavery was a favorite topic with many of our ablest statesmen_, who entertained, with respect, all the schemes which wisdom or ingenuity could suggest for accomplishing the object. Mr. Wythe, to the day of his death, _was for a simple abolition, considering the objection to color as founded in prejudice_. By degrees, all projects of the kind were abandoned. Mr. Jefferson _retained_ his opinion, and now we have these projects revived." Governor Barbour, of Virginia, in his speech in the U.S. Senate, on the Missouri question, Jan. 1820, said: "We are asked why has Virginia changed her policy in reference to slavery? That the sentiments of our most distinguished men, for thirty years _entirely corresponded_ with the course which the friends of the restriction (of slavery in Missouri) now advocated; and that the Virginia delegation, one of whom was the late President of the United States, voted for the restriction (of slavery) in the northwestern territory, and that Mr. Jefferson has delineated a gloomy picture of the baneful effects of slavery. When it is recollected that the Notes of Mr. Jefferson were written during the progress of the revolution, it is no matter of surprise that the writer should have imbibed a large portion of that enthus
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657  
658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Virginia
 

slavery

 

Jefferson

 

slaves

 

emancipation

 

commonwealth

 
projects
 

restriction

 

Missouri

 

gradual


United
 

States

 

object

 
speech
 
abolition
 
revolution
 

opinion

 
Governor
 

schemes

 

respect


wisdom

 

Barbour

 

ingenuity

 

revived

 

abandoned

 
degrees
 

objection

 
prejudice
 

simple

 

founded


suggest

 

accomplishing

 

retained

 

picture

 
baneful
 

effects

 
recollected
 

gloomy

 

delineated

 

President


northwestern

 

territory

 

written

 
imbibed
 

portion

 
enthus
 
writer
 

progress

 
matter
 
surprise