FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
hat the whole operation was controlled by English army officers who were detailed from London or from South Africa for the purpose.[33] [Footnote 32: Leonard _v_. Sparks Bros. & McGee, Civil District Court, Parish of New Orleans, Division E, No. 62,770, Feb. 24, 1902.] [Footnote 33: H.R., Doc. 568, 57 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 9; also pp. 10-13 passim.] The testimony of Charles J. Cole showed that as foreman in charge of seventy or more men he had made six trips to South Africa in the service of the British Government or of its agents. His testimony was substantiated by certificates for seamen discharged before the superintendent of a mercantile marine office in the British Empire, a British consul, or a shipping officer on board the vessel on which he had sailed. He had been employed on the transports _Prah, Montcalm, Knight Bachelor, Montezuma_, and _Rosetta_, all engaged in transporting horses and mules to the British army in South Africa. He testified that the transports were in charge of regular officers of the English army and that from them all orders were received. He also avowed that many of the men were urged and solicited by the officers to join the British army, and were unable to obtain their pay unless they complied with the request.[34] [Footnote 34: Pearson et al. _v_. Parson et al., United States Circuit Court, Eastern District of Louisiana; also H.R., Doc. 568, 57 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 20.] The affidavit of R.J. Tourres showed that he had served on the ship _Milwaukee_. He averred that the ship's articles were signed by him before the vice-consul of the British Government; that he was finally referred to an officer of the English army for duty and acted under his orders during the voyage from New Orleans to Cape Town; that when the vessel was not allowed to land its cargo at that place on account of the plague the consignment of horses and mules for the British army was delivered at Durban to English officers in uniform; that he was not allowed to go ashore except upon the condition of signing with the recruiting officer and joining the British army; that during the entire voyage a British military officer in uniform controlled the ship's crew; and that among the men the _Milwaukee_ was known as a transport under the direct command of regularly detailed officers of the English army.[35] [Footnote 35: Sworn to before notary public Mch. 21, 1902. H.R., Doc. 568, 57 Cong., 1 Sess., p. 21.] The testi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

British

 

English

 

officers

 

Footnote

 

officer

 

Africa

 

charge

 

showed

 

consul

 

vessel


transports
 

Milwaukee

 

horses

 
Government
 

allowed

 

voyage

 

orders

 

Orleans

 
controlled
 

detailed


District

 

testimony

 
uniform
 

served

 

notary

 
affidavit
 

consignment

 

Tourres

 

regularly

 

signed


command
 

articles

 
averred
 
Louisiana
 

Durban

 

Pearson

 

request

 

complied

 

Parson

 

United


Eastern
 

public

 

Circuit

 

States

 
direct
 

entire

 

joining

 

military

 

recruiting

 
signing