FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296  
297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   >>  
f coal--and white wings out of hot water! It is a great age this of ours, for traction and extraction, if it only knew what to extract from itself, or where to drag itself to! 55. But in the meantime I want the public to admire this patience of yours, while they have it, and to understand what it has cost to give them even this, which has to pass away. We will not take instance in figure engraving, of which the complex skill and textural gradation by dot and checker must be wholly incomprehensible to amateurs; but we will take a piece of average landscape engraving, such as is sent out of any good workshop--the master who puts his name at the bottom of the plate being of course responsible only for the general method, for the sufficient skill of subordinate hands, and for the few finishing touches if necessary. We will take, for example, the plate of Turner's "Mercury and Argus," engraved in this Journal.[68] 56. I suppose most people, looking at such a plate, fancy it is produced by some simple mechanical artifice, which is to drawing only what printing is to writing. They conclude, at all events, that there is something complacent, sympathetic, and helpful in the nature of steel; so that while a pen-and-ink sketch may always be considered an achievement proving cleverness in the sketcher, a sketch on steel comes out by mere favor of the indulgent metal: or perhaps they think the plate is woven like a piece of pattern silk, and the pattern is developed by pasteboard cards punched full of holes. Not so. Look close at that engraving--imagine it to be a drawing in pen and ink, and yourself required similarly to produce its parallel! True, the steel point has the one advantage of not blotting, but it has tenfold or twentyfold disadvantage, in that you cannot slur, nor efface, except in a very resolute and laborious way, nor play with it, nor even see what you are doing with it at the moment, far less the effect that is to be. You must _feel_ what you are doing with it, and know precisely what you have got to do; how deep--how broad--how far apart--your lines must be, etc. and etc. (a couple of lines of etc.'s would not be enough to imply all you must know). But suppose the plate _were_ only a pen drawing: take your pen--your finest--and just try to copy the leaves that entangle the nearest cow's head and the head itself; remembering always that the kind of work required here is mere child's play compared to that of fine
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296  
297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   >>  



Top keywords:

engraving

 

drawing

 
pattern
 

suppose

 
required
 

sketch

 

produce

 
parallel
 

imagine

 

similarly


sketcher

 

cleverness

 

proving

 
considered
 

achievement

 

indulgent

 
developed
 

pasteboard

 

punched

 

moment


finest
 

couple

 
leaves
 
entangle
 

compared

 
nearest
 

remembering

 

efface

 

disadvantage

 

advantage


blotting

 

tenfold

 

twentyfold

 
resolute
 

laborious

 

precisely

 

effect

 

produced

 

instance

 

figure


complex

 

textural

 
understand
 

gradation

 

landscape

 

average

 

checker

 

wholly

 

incomprehensible

 
amateurs