FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193  
194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   >>   >|  
ing Courtenay, his words would have been far more effective than they were. This, however, it was hard for Wyatt to do, as it would have been equivalent to a repetition of his accusations.] [Footnote 309: Les gens de loy ne treuvent matiere pour la condamner.--Renard to Charles V., April 22: Tytler, vol. ii.] [Footnote 310: Ibid. And see a passage in the MS., which Mr. Tytler has omitted.] The threatened escape of her sister, too, was but the beginning of the queen's sorrows. On the 17th of April Sir Nicholas Throgmorton was tried at the Guildhall for having been a party to the conspiracy. The confessions of many of the prisoners had more or less implicated Throgmorton. Cuthbert Vaughan, who was out with Wyatt, swore in the court that Throgmorton had discussed the plan of the insurrection with him; and Throgmorton himself admitted that he had talked to Sir Peter Carew and Wyatt about the probability of a rebellion. He it was, too, who was to have conducted Courtenay to Andover on his flight into Devonshire; and the evidence[311] leaves very little doubt that he was concerned as deeply as any one who did not actually take up arms. Sir Nicholas, however, defended himself with resolute pertinacity; he fought through all the charges against him, and dissected the depositions with the skill of a practised pleader; and in the end, the jury returned the bold verdict of {p.132} "Not guilty." Sir Thomas Bromley urged them to remember themselves. The foreman answered they had found the verdict according to their consciences. [Footnote 311: It is printed at length in Holinshed.] Their consciences probably found less difficulty in the facts charged against Throgmorton than in the guilt to be attached to them. The verdict was intended as a rebuke to the cruelty with which the rebellion had been punished, and it was received as an insult to the crown. The crowd, as Throgmorton left the court, threw up their caps and shouted. The queen was ill for three days with mortification,[312] and insisted that the jurors should be punished. They were arrested, and kept as prisoners till the following winter, when they were released on payment of the ruinous fine of L2000. Throgmorton himself was seized again on some other pretext, and sent again to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193  
194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Throgmorton

 
Footnote
 

verdict

 
Tytler
 
prisoners
 

rebellion

 

consciences

 

punished

 
Nicholas
 
Courtenay

answered
 

defended

 

foreman

 

pertinacity

 

pleader

 

returned

 

practised

 

fought

 
dissected
 
depositions

charges

 

resolute

 

Bromley

 

Thomas

 

guilty

 

remember

 
attached
 
arrested
 

jurors

 
mortification

insisted

 
winter
 

pretext

 
seized
 
released
 

payment

 
ruinous
 

difficulty

 

charged

 
printed

length

 

Holinshed

 

intended

 

rebuke

 

shouted

 

cruelty

 
received
 

insult

 

Charles

 

passage