FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194  
195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   >>   >|  
the Tower. The council, or Paget's party there, remonstrated against the arrest; they yielded, however, perhaps that they might make the firmer stand on more important matters. [Footnote 312: Que tant altere la dicte dame qu'elle a este trois jours malade, et n'est encore bien d'elle.--Renard to Charles V.: Tytler, vol. ii. p. 374.] Since Elizabeth could not be executed, the court were the more anxious to carry the Succession Bill. Gardiner's first desire was that Elizabeth should be excluded by name; but Paget said that this was impossible.[313] As little could a measure be passed empowering the queen to leave the crown by will, for that would be but the same thing under another form. Following up his purpose, notwithstanding, Gardiner brought out in the House of Lords a pedigree, tracing Philip's descent from John of Gaunt; and he introduced a bill to make offences against his person high treason. But at the second reading the important words were introduced, "during the queen's lifetime;"[314] the bill was read a third time, and then disappeared; and Paget had been the loudest of its opponents.[315] [Footnote 313: He whom you wrote of comes to me with a sudden and strange proposal, that, since matters against Madame Elizabeth do not take the turn which was wished, there should be an Act brought into Parliament to disinherit her. I replied that I would give no consent to such a scheme.--Paget to Renard: Tytler, vol. ii. p. 382.] [Footnote 314: _Lords Journals._] [Footnote 315: Renard complains of Paget's conduct bitterly.--Renard to Charles V., May 1: Tytler, vol. ii.] Beaten on the succession, the chancellor, in spite of Renard's remonstrances, brought forward next his Religious Persecution Bills. The House of Commons went with him to some extent; and, to secure success in some form or other, he introduced three separate measures, either of which would answer his purpose--{p.133} a bill for the restoration of the Six Articles, a bill to re-enact the Lollard Statute of Henry IV., _De Haeretico Comburendo_, and a bill to restore (in more than its original vigour) the Episcopal Jurisdiction. The Six Articles had so bad a name
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194  
195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Renard

 

Footnote

 

introduced

 

Elizabeth

 
brought
 
Tytler
 

purpose

 

Gardiner

 

Articles

 

matters


Charles

 
important
 

restore

 

Comburendo

 
disinherit
 

Parliament

 
replied
 
opponents
 
Haeretico
 

original


Madame

 

proposal

 
strange
 

Jurisdiction

 

sudden

 
vigour
 

Episcopal

 

wished

 
consent
 
Commons

Persecution
 

Religious

 
forward
 
restoration
 

answer

 

success

 

secure

 

extent

 
measures
 

separate


remonstrances

 
Journals
 

complains

 

Statute

 

scheme

 

conduct

 

bitterly

 

chancellor

 

succession

 

Lollard