FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167  
168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   >>   >|  
d that there was (1) a histological and (2) a morphological difference between the two categories of bones. The histological development of the two kinds was different, but this difference was not sufficient to establish a morphological distinction between them, a distinction in their anatomical _Bedeutung_. The true morphological distinction between them was their development in different skeleton-forming layers. Membrane bones were developed in fibrous tissue lying between the skin and the deep layer which formed the primordial cranium, and it was this formation in a separate layer that gave them a different morphological significance from the bones formed directly in the deep layer. Koelliker's distinction, therefore, was between the bones formed in the primordial cartilaginous cranium on the one hand, and the superficial ossifications in fibrous tissue on the other hand. The cartilaginous cranium in Koelliker's opinion was formed upon the vertebral type, and the membrane bones were accessory. This, at least, was his opinion in 1849. In 1850, after Stannius had shown that membrane bones occurred as integral parts of the vertebrae in certain fish, he modified his view of the membrane bones, and admitted them, at least in some cases, as constituents of the cranial vertebrae. On this morphological distinction of membrane and cartilage bones future comparative osteology was to be based:-- "My sole aim is to state again the principle upon which comparative osteology is to be based and extended, and this is that first place should be assigned to anatomical considerations, and among these to the manner of origin of the whole bone in relation to the skeleton-forming layers" (1850, p. 290). The homologies established by this new principle might run counter to the homologies indicated by the study of adult structure. "Thus, for instance, although the lower jaw in position, function, form and shape, appears to be the same bone throughout, yet it must be admitted that it shows a difference in the different classes. In Mammals and Man it is an entirely secondary bone (an extremity according to Reichert), in Birds, Amphibia and Fishes only partially so, for its articular belongs to Meckel's cartilage and is accordingly analogous to a rib; indeed, in the Plagiostomes, etc., the whole lower jaw along with the articular is a persistent Meckel's cartilage" (p. 290, 1850). So, too, the supraoccipital in man cannot be fully homol
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167  
168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
distinction
 

morphological

 

membrane

 
formed
 

difference

 

cartilage

 

cranium

 

Koelliker

 

opinion

 

admitted


osteology

 
homologies
 

comparative

 
principle
 
articular
 

vertebrae

 

cartilaginous

 

fibrous

 

forming

 

skeleton


development

 

tissue

 

histological

 

anatomical

 

Meckel

 
primordial
 

layers

 

structure

 

position

 

instance


persistent

 

established

 
relation
 

supraoccipital

 

counter

 

Plagiostomes

 

Reichert

 

analogous

 

secondary

 

extremity


Amphibia
 
partially
 

belongs

 

Fishes

 

appears

 
Mammals
 

classes

 
function
 
directly
 

significance