FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  
n of man and the digitate mammals, and yet what differences between their attitudes when standing! The same holds true as regards the normal attitudes of the pleuronectids and the other fishes" (p. 107). The exact way in which Geoffroy homologised the parts of the appendages in Arthropods with the paired pieces of the typical vertebra is best shown by the reproduction of his figure of an abdominal segment of the lobster (Fig. 3), in which the parts homologous with those represented in the figure of the typical vertebra (Fig. 2) are indicated by the same letters. The ingenuity of the comparison is astonishing. [Illustration: FIG. 3.--Abdominal Segment of the Lobster. (After Geoffroy.)] The comparison of the Arthropod with the Vertebrate is extended also to the internal organs. The internal organs of the Arthropod are shown to stand in the same order to one another as in the Vertebrate, only the organs are inverted. Thus the nervous system is dorsal in the Vertebrate, ventral in the Arthropod. Turn the Arthropod on its back and the relative positions of the systems of organs are the same as in the Vertebrate. The relation of the organs to the external tube is of course different in Arthropods and Vertebrates, but this is no contradiction of the principle of connections. "Such a tube, although it is the organs essential to life that it contains, can yet behave in different ways with regard to the mass of these organs: the principle of connections demands only that all the organs maintain with one another fixed and definite relations; but the principle would be in no way invalidated if the whole mass had rotated inside the tube" (p. 112). Geoffroy pushed the analogy between Arthropods and Vertebrates very far, for he asserted that every piece in the skeleton of an insect was homologous with some bone in Vertebrates, that it stood always in its proper place, and remained faithful to at least one of its connections.[93] It does not appear that he attempted to prove in detail this very big assumption, but the beginnings of a detailed comparison are found in the paper of 1820, _Sur l'organisation des insectes_. Six segments are distinguished in an insect--the head, the three divisions of the thorax, the abdomen, and the terminal segment of the abdomen (p. 455). The skeleton of the insect's head is said to correspond to the bones of the face, to the bones of the cerebrum and to the hyoid of higher Vertebrates, the ske
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80  
81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

organs

 

Vertebrates

 

Arthropod

 

Vertebrate

 

Arthropods

 

comparison

 

Geoffroy

 

insect

 

connections

 

principle


segment
 

homologous

 

attitudes

 
internal
 

figure

 

skeleton

 

typical

 

abdomen

 
vertebra
 

relations


remained

 

proper

 
definite
 

inside

 

analogy

 
invalidated
 

faithful

 

asserted

 

pushed

 

rotated


attempted
 

divisions

 
thorax
 
distinguished
 

segments

 

insectes

 

terminal

 

higher

 

cerebrum

 

correspond


organisation
 

detail

 

detailed

 

assumption

 
beginnings
 

essential

 

Illustration

 

Abdominal

 

astonishing

 
letters