FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109  
110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   >>   >|  
hagus, the fallopian tubes to the intestine, and so on. The vertebral theory of the skull took its origin from the same habit of thought. As part of the wider idea of the metameric repetition of parts it had some scientific worth, but the theory was pushed too far, and the facts were twisted to suit it. Among annulate animals the theory of repetition found ample scope; Oken was able to compare with justice the jaws of crabs and insects with their other limbs, as Savigny did later in a more scientific way. Among Vertebrates the application of the theory of serial repetition was not so obvious, except in the case of the vertebrae. Goethe seems to have been the first to hit upon the idea that the skull is composed of a number of vertebrae, serially homologous with those of the vertebral column. He tells us that the idea flashed into his mind when contemplating in the Jewish cemetery at Venice a dried sheep's skull. The discovery was made in 1790, but not published till 1820.[154] The idea seems to have been taught by Kielmeyer, one of the earliest of the "philosophers of nature," but it was not published by him. In a book (_Cours d'Etudes medicales_), published in 1803, Burdin assimilated the skull to the vertebral column. Oken, in an inaugural dissertation (Programm) _Ueber die Bedeutung der Schaedelknochen_,[155] published in 1807, gave to the theory its necessary development. Autenrieth, also in 1807,[156] distinguishing separate ganglia in the brain, was not far from the hypothesis that each of these ganglia must have its separate vertebra. In 1808 Dumeril read a paper to the Academie des Sciences in which he compared the skull to a gigantic vertebra, basing his hypothesis on the similarity existing between the crests and depressions on the hinder part of the skull and those on the posterior surfaces of the vertebrae. After Oken's work the vertebral theory was taken up generally by both the German and the French anatomists. Spix published in 1815 a large volume on the skull, entitled _Cephalogenesis_, distinguishing (as Oken did at first) three cranial vertebrae. Bojanus in his _Anatome testudinis europaeae_ (1819), and in a series of papers in _Isis_ (1817-1819, and 1821) established the existence of a fourth cranial vertebra, and this was accepted by Oken in the later editions of his _Lehrbuch_. Meckel and Carus among the Germans, de Blainville and E. Geoffroy among the French, contributed to the developme
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109  
110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

theory

 

published

 

vertebrae

 

vertebral

 

repetition

 

vertebra

 

hypothesis

 

cranial

 

column

 

French


ganglia
 

separate

 

scientific

 
distinguishing
 

gigantic

 

compared

 

Bedeutung

 

existing

 
dissertation
 

similarity


basing

 

Programm

 
Sciences
 

Autenrieth

 

development

 
Dumeril
 

Academie

 

Schaedelknochen

 

generally

 

established


existence
 

papers

 
Anatome
 
testudinis
 

europaeae

 

series

 

fourth

 

Blainville

 

contributed

 

Geoffroy


Germans
 

accepted

 

editions

 

Lehrbuch

 
Meckel
 

Bojanus

 

surfaces

 

crests

 

depressions

 
hinder