FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>   >|  
s; antennae, nostrils turned outside in. Duges also made a comparison of Articulates with Vertebrates.[139] He did not accept Geoffroy's vertebral theory of the Arthropod skeleton, though he admitted that in Arthropods the dorsal surface was turned towards the ground, basing this assumption on the position of the nervous system, and also, curiously enough, on the inverted position of the embryo on the lower surface of the yolk. He considered that the mandibles and first maxillae of Arthropods were the homologues of the upper and lower jaws of Vertebrates, adducing as confirmatory evidence the fact that in snakes the rami are separate. The labium was the equivalent of the hyoid, the labial palps and maxillipedes the equivalent of the "hyoid" elements which form the branchial arches. But Duges' main contribution to morphological method was his conception of the living organism as a colony of lesser units, which were themselves real "organisms." "By _organism_ the author means a complex of organs which taken together suffice to constitute, ideally or actually, a complete animal. An 'organism' is, as it were, an elementary or simple animal; several organisms combined form a complex animal" (p. 255). Duges hit upon this principle, which was first suggested to him by A. Moquin-Tandon's work on the leech (1827), as a great aid in demonstrating the unity of plan and composition throughout the animal kingdom.[140] According to his view there are three main types of animals--(1) Biserials, including bilaterally symmetrical animals, composed of two parallel series of "organisms"; (2) Radiates, composed of "organisms" arranged like the spokes of a wheel; and (3) Raceme-animals, in which the separate "organisms" were disposed more or less irregularly, in bunches (p. 257). The unitary "organism" is supposed to be the same in all, only the arrangement differing. Duges of course admitted that the centralisation of the complete organism became greater the higher it stood in the scale, and that this held good also in individual development. The appendages of Articulates and Vertebrates were thought of as the members of as many separate organisms. He went so far as to suggest that the fingers of a man's hand were the free extremities of as many thoracic members. Duges' conception of the organism has often been revived since in a saner form, _e.g._, by E. Perrier, and it has a certain validity. It has much affinity with the similar co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

organism

 

organisms

 

animal

 

animals

 

separate

 

Vertebrates

 

complete

 

turned

 

conception

 

equivalent


members
 

complex

 

composed

 
Articulates
 

Arthropods

 

admitted

 

surface

 

position

 
Raceme
 

kingdom


demonstrating

 

disposed

 
unitary
 

bunches

 

irregularly

 
composition
 

spokes

 

symmetrical

 

including

 

bilaterally


parallel
 

Biserials

 
arranged
 
Radiates
 

series

 

According

 

centralisation

 

revived

 

thoracic

 

extremities


fingers
 

affinity

 

similar

 

validity

 
Perrier
 

suggest

 

greater

 

differing

 

arrangement

 
higher