FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>  
rediction of such an event. The plan's completion, in late 1981, promises to improve substantially the state of readiness to respond to the prediction and the occurrence of an earthquake in that area and to provide a model which could be applied to other earthquake-prone regions of California and the rest of the country. F. FINDINGS, ISSUES, AND ACTIONS The _ad hoc_ committee responsible for this review developed several significant findings related to the implications of major earthquakes in California and our capabilities to respond to them. It then identified major relevant issues raised by these findings and caused a number of actions to be taken. A brief discussion of the results of its review follows. 1. Leadership =Finding=: _Effective leadership at all governmental levels is the single most important factor needed to improve this Nation's preparedness for a catastrophic earthquake in California._ The problem of emergency preparedness is severely complicated because responsibilities for preparation and response cut across normal lines of authority. Further complication arises from the large areal extent of the impacts expected from a major earthquake, affecting literally dozens of government entities. The emergency services coordinator at any level of government is effective only to the extent he or she is backed by the political leadership at that level. This is especially true when preparedness activities must be done, for the most part, within existing resources. City and county officials must increasingly accept their share of the responsibility for preparedness, but commitment by State or Federal leaders is also essential. The general tendency among elected officials and the public is to ignore the existing hazard problem. Experience, however, teaches that effective response mechanisms must be in place before the disaster; they cannot be developed in the time of crisis. Overcoming this apathy and developing the organizational arrangements among Federal, State, and local government and volunteer agencies--together with the private sector and the general public will require, above all, leadership. =Issue=: The leadership role of the Federal Government in preparing for a catastrophic earthquake in California and how this leadership role is to be exerted require clarification. =Action=: The President has communicated with the Governor of California to ind
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>  



Top keywords:
California
 

earthquake

 

leadership

 

preparedness

 
government
 

Federal

 
public
 

problem

 

emergency

 

findings


developed

 

review

 
catastrophic
 
require
 

improve

 
effective
 

extent

 
officials
 

respond

 

response


existing

 
general
 

county

 

increasingly

 
accept
 

resources

 

coordinator

 

dozens

 

entities

 

services


backed

 

political

 
activities
 

responsibility

 
sector
 

private

 

arrangements

 

volunteer

 

agencies

 
Government

preparing

 
communicated
 

Governor

 

President

 

Action

 

exerted

 

clarification

 

organizational

 

developing

 

ignore