and the second to
take advantage of a tide that had turned to ruin the Whig leaders. (For
a fuller discussion of the relationship of Dryden's tract and his poem
see the writer's article, "The Conclusion of Dryden's Absalom and
Achitophel" in the _Huntington Library Quarterly_, X (1946-7), 69-82.)
In addition to its historical interest Dryden's tract is a fine specimen
of his masculine, vigorous style so well suited to controversial
writing.
I desire to thank Mr. James M. Osborn, Yale University, for helpful
suggestions in the preparation of this introduction.
This facsimile has been made from the copy in the William Andrews Clark
Memorial Library.
_Godfrey Davies_
_The Huntington Library_
His Majesties
DECLARATION
DEFENDED:
In a _LETTER_ to a Friend.
BEING AN
_ANSWER_
TO A
_Seditious Pamphlet_,
CALLED
_A LETTER from a Person of Quality
to his Friend_:
CONCERNING
The Kings late Declaration touching the Reasons
which moved him to Dissolve
THE TWO LAST
_PARLIAMENTS_
AT
_WESTMINSTER_ and _OXFORD_.
_LONDON:_
Printed for _T. Davies, 1681_.
THE
Kings Declaration
DEFENDED.
Sir,
Since you are pleas'd to require my Opinion of the Kings Declaration,
and the Answer to it, which you write me word was sent you lately, I
shall obey you the more willingly, because I know you are a lover of the
Peace and Quietness of your Country; which the Author of this seditious
Pamphlet, is endeavouring to disturb. Be pleas'd to understand then,
that before the Declaration was yet published, and while it was only the
common news, that such an one there was intended, to justifie the
Dissolution of the two last Parliaments; it was generally agreed by the
heads of the discontented Party, that this Declaration must be answer'd,
and that with all the ingredients of malice which the ablest amongst
them could squeeze into it. Accordingly, upon the first appearance of it
in Print, five several Pens of their _Cabal_ were set to work; and the
product of each having been examin'd, a certain person of Quality
appears to have carried the majority of Votes, and to be chosen like a
new _Matthias_, to succeed in the place of their deceas'd _Judas_.
He seems to be a man cut out to carry on vigorously the designs of the
Phanatique Party, which are manifestly in this Paper, to hinder the
King, from making any good impression on his Subjects, by giving them
all possible satisfaction.
|