FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  
with respect to inheritance, among the ancient Mexicans,"--"On the social organization and mode of government of the ancient Mexicans," _Peabody Museum Reports_, vol. ii., 1876-79, pp. 95-161, 385-448, 557-699.] [Sidenote: The Aztec confederacy.] At this point in our exposition a very concise summary of Mr. Bandelier's results will suffice to enable the reader to understand their import. What has been called the "empire of Montezuma" was in reality a confederacy of three tribes, the Aztecs, Tezcucans, and Tlacopans,[108] dwelling in three large composite pueblos situated very near together in one of the strongest defensive positions ever occupied by Indians. This Aztec confederacy extended its "sway" over a considerable portion of the Mexican peninsula, but that "sway" could not correctly be described as "empire," for it was in no sense a military occupation of the country. The confederacy did not have garrisons in subject pueblos or civil officials to administer their affairs for them. It simply sent some of its chiefs about from one pueblo to another to collect tribute. This tax consisted in great part of maize and other food, and each tributary pueblo reserved a certain portion of its tribal territory to be cultivated for the benefit of the domineering confederacy. If a pueblo proved delinquent or recalcitrant, Aztec warriors swooped down upon it in stealthy midnight assault, butchered its inhabitants and emptied its granaries, and when the paroxysm of rage had spent itself, went exulting homeward, carrying away women for concubines, men to be sacrificed, and such miscellaneous booty as could be conveyed without wagons or beasts to draw them.[109] If the sudden assault, with scaling ladders, happened to fail, the assailants were likely to be baffled, for there was no artillery, and so little food could be carried that a siege meant starvation for the besiegers. [Footnote 108: In the Iroquois confederacy the Mohawks enjoyed a certain precedence or seniority, the Onondagas had the central council-fire, and the Senecas, who had the two head war-chiefs, were much the most numerous. In the Mexican confederacy the various points of superiority seem to have been more concentrated in the Aztecs; but spoils and tribute were divided into five portions, of which Mexico and Tezcuco each took two, and Tlacopan one.]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

confederacy

 

pueblo

 

empire

 

Aztecs

 

portion

 

pueblos

 

assault

 

chiefs

 

tribute

 

Mexican


ancient
 

Mexicans

 

sacrificed

 
miscellaneous
 

concubines

 

carrying

 

conveyed

 

sudden

 
scaling
 

beasts


happened

 

homeward

 
wagons
 

ladders

 

stealthy

 
midnight
 

swooped

 

warriors

 

domineering

 

proved


delinquent
 

recalcitrant

 
butchered
 
inhabitants
 

assailants

 

paroxysm

 

emptied

 

granaries

 

exulting

 

baffled


points
 

superiority

 

numerous

 

concentrated

 
Mexico
 

Tezcuco

 

Tlacopan

 

portions

 

spoils

 
divided