FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   >>   >|  
historic Man_, chap. x. The annual _Smithsonian Reports_ for thirty years past illustrate the growth of knowledge and progressive changes of opinion on the subject. The bibliographical account in Winsor's _Narr. and Crit. Hist._, i. 397-412, is full of minute information.] [Footnote 156: _Houses and House-Life_, chap. ix.] [Sidenote: The mounds were probably built by different peoples in the lower status of barbarism;] [Sidenote: by Cherokees;] [Sidenote: and by Shawnees, and other tribes.] Recent researches, however, make it more and more improbable that the mound-builders were nearly akin to such people as the Zunis or similar to them in grade of culture. Of late years the exploration of the mounds has been carried on with increasing diligence. More than 2,000 mounds have been opened, and at least 38,000 ancient relics have been gathered from them: such as quartzite arrow-heads and spades, greenstone axes and hammers, mortars and pestles, tools for spinning and weaving, and cloth, made of spun thread and woven with warp and woof, somewhat like a coarse sail-cloth. The water-jugs, kettles, pipes, and sepulchral urns have been elaborately studied. The net results of all this investigation, up to the present time, have been concisely summed up by Dr. Cyrus Thomas.[157] The mounds were not all built by one people, but by different tribes as clearly distinguishable from one another as Algonquins are distinguishable from Iroquois. These mound-building tribes were not superior in culture to the Iroquois and many of the Algonquins as first seen by white men. They are not to be classified with Zunis, still less with Mexicans or Mayas, in point of culture, but with Shawnees and Cherokees. Nay more,--some of them _were_ Shawnees and Cherokees. The missionary Johann Heckewelder long ago published the Lenape tradition of the Tallegwi or Allighewi people, who have left their name upon the Alleghany river and mountains.[158] The Tallegwi have been identified with the Cherokees, who are now reckoned among the most intelligent and progressive of Indian peoples.[159] The Cherokees were formerly classed in the Muskoki group, along with the Creeks and Choctaws, but a closer study of their language seems to show that they were a somewhat remote offshoot of the Huron-Iroquois stock. For a long time they occupied the country between the Ohio river and the Great Lakes, and probably built
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cherokees

 

mounds

 

Iroquois

 

culture

 

Sidenote

 

tribes

 

Shawnees

 
people
 

peoples

 

progressive


Tallegwi

 

Algonquins

 

distinguishable

 

studied

 

Mexicans

 

investigation

 
classified
 

results

 

present

 

building


Thomas

 

superior

 

summed

 

concisely

 

tradition

 

closer

 
language
 

Choctaws

 

Creeks

 

classed


Muskoki

 

remote

 

country

 

occupied

 

offshoot

 

Lenape

 

elaborately

 

Allighewi

 
published
 

missionary


Johann
 
Heckewelder
 

intelligent

 
Indian
 

reckoned

 
Alleghany
 

mountains

 

identified

 

Houses

 

Footnote