FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888  
889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   >>   >|  
it appears that it remains after the consecration. Obj. 3: Further, the proper operation of a things follows its substantial form. But what remains in this sacrament, nourishes, and performs every operation which bread would do were it present. Therefore the substantial form of the bread remains in this sacrament after the consecration. _On the contrary,_ The substantial form of bread is of the substance of bread. But the substance of the bread is changed into the body of Christ, as stated above (AA. 2, 3, 4). Therefore the substantial form of the bread does not remain. _I answer that,_ Some have contended that after the consecration not only do the accidents of the bread remain, but also its substantial form. But this cannot be. First of all, because if the substantial form of the bread were to remain, nothing of the bread would be changed into the body of Christ, excepting the matter; and so it would follow that it would be changed, not into the whole body of Christ, but into its matter, which is repugnant to the form of the sacrament, wherein it is said: "This is My body." Secondly, because if the substantial form of the bread were to remain, it would remain either in matter, or separated from matter. The first cannot be, for if it were to remain in the matter of the bread, then the whole substance of the bread would remain, which is against what was said above (A. 2). Nor could it remain in any other matter, because the proper form exists only in its proper matter. But if it were to remain separate from matter, it would then be an actually intelligible form, and also an intelligence; for all forms separated from matter are such. Thirdly, it would be unbefitting this sacrament: because the accidents of the bread remain in this sacrament, in order that the body of Christ may be seen under them, and not under its proper species, as stated above (A. 5). And therefore it must be said that the substantial form of the bread does not remain. Reply Obj. 1: There is nothing to prevent art from making a thing whose form is not an accident, but a substantial form; as frogs and serpents can be produced by art: for art produces such forms not by its own power, but by the power of natural energies. And in this way it produces the substantial forms of bread, by the power of fire baking the matter made up of flour and water. Reply Obj. 2: The soul is the form of the body, giving it the whole order of perfect bei
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   864   865   866   867   868   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888  
889   890   891   892   893   894   895   896   897   898   899   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

remain

 

substantial

 
matter
 

sacrament

 

Christ

 

proper

 

consecration

 
remains
 

changed


substance

 

accidents

 

operation

 

produces

 

Therefore

 
stated
 

separated

 

prevent

 

species


unbefitting

 

baking

 

perfect

 

giving

 
energies
 
accident
 
serpents
 

natural

 
Thirdly

produced

 
making
 
answer
 
appears
 

excepting

 
contended
 
contrary
 

things

 

Further


nourishes
 
performs
 

present

 
exists
 

separate

 

intelligence

 

intelligible

 

repugnant

 

follow


Secondly