FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776  
777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   >>   >|  
er the sacrament of Baptism; while the other, however great his right to baptize, if he presume to utter the words, would be liable to be punished as a rebaptizer. If, however, they were to pronounce the words absolutely at the same time, and dipped or sprinkled the man together, they should be punished for baptizing in an improper manner, but not for rebaptizing: because each would intend to baptize an unbaptized person, and each, so far as he is concerned, would baptize. Nor would they confer several sacraments: but the one Christ baptizing inwardly would confer one sacrament by means of both together. Reply Obj. 1: This argument avails in those agents that act by their own power. But men do not baptize by their own, but by Christ's power, Who, since He is one, perfects His work by means of one minister. Reply Obj. 2: In a case of necessity one could baptize several at the same time under this form: "I baptize ye": for instance, if they were threatened by a falling house, or by the sword or something of the kind, so as not to allow of the delay involved by baptizing them singly. Nor would this cause a change in the Church's form, since the plural is nothing but the singular doubled: especially as we find the plural expressed in Matt. 28:19: "Baptizing them," etc. Nor is there parity between the baptizer and the baptized; since Christ, the baptizer in chief, is one: while many are made one in Christ by Baptism. Reply Obj. 3: As stated above (Q. 66, A. 1), the integrity of Baptism consists in the form of words and the use of the matter. Consequently, neither he who only pronounces the words, baptizes, nor he who dips. Wherefore if one pronounces the words and the other dips, no form of words can be fitting. For neither could he say: "I baptize thee": since he dips not, and therefore baptizes not. Nor could they say: "We baptize thee": since neither baptizes. For if of two men, one write one part of a book, and the other write the other, it would not be a proper form of speech to say: "We wrote this book," but the figure of synecdoche in which the whole is put for the part. _______________________ SEVENTH ARTICLE [III, Q. 67, Art. 7] Whether in Baptism It Is Necessary for Someone to Raise the Baptized from the Sacred Font? Objection 1: It seems that in Baptism it is not necessary for someone to raise the baptized from the sacred font. For our Baptism is consecrated by Christ's Baptism and is conformed ther
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776  
777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

baptize

 

Baptism

 
Christ
 

baptizes

 

baptizing

 

confer

 

pronounces

 
baptizer
 

sacrament

 

punished


plural

 

baptized

 

Consequently

 

stated

 
fitting
 

Wherefore

 

integrity

 

consists

 

matter

 

ARTICLE


Objection

 

Sacred

 
Baptized
 
Someone
 
consecrated
 

conformed

 
sacred
 

Necessary

 
figure
 
synecdoche

speech
 

proper

 
Whether
 
SEVENTH
 

instance

 

sacraments

 
inwardly
 
concerned
 

intend

 
unbaptized

person

 

argument

 

agents

 

avails

 

rebaptizing

 

liable

 
rebaptizer
 

presume

 
pronounce
 

improper