FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77  
78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   >>   >|  
been a disputed point, whether the system of _breeding in-and-in_, or the opposite one of frequent crossing, has the greater tendency to improve the character of stock This term, in-and-in, is often very loosely used and as variously understood. Some confine the phrase to the coupling of those of exactly the same blood, as brothers and sisters, while others include in it breeding from parents and offsprings; and others still employ it to embrace those of a more distant relationship. For the last, the term breeding-in, or close breeding, is generally deemed more suitable. The current opinion is decidedly against the practice of breeding from any near relatives; it being usually found that degeneracy follows, and often to a serious degree; but it is not proved that this degeneracy, although very common and even usual, is yet a necessary consequence. That ill effects follow, in a majority of cases, is not to be doubted; but this is easily and sufficiently accounted for upon quite other grounds. Perhaps, however, the following propositions may be safely stated: That in general practice, with the grades and mixed animals common in the country, _close-breeding should be scrupulously avoided_ as highly detrimental. It is better _always_ to avoid breeding from near relatives whenever stock-getters of the same breed and of equal merit can be obtained which are not related. Yet, where this is not possible, or where there is some desirable and clearly defined purpose in view--as the fixing and perpetuating of some valuable quality in a particular animal not common to the breed--and the breeder possesses the knowledge and skill needful to accomplish his purpose, and the animals are perfect in health and development, close breeding may be practised with advantage. The practice of _crossing_, like that of close breeding, has its strong and its weak side. Judiciously practised, it offers a means of providing animals _for the butcher_, often superior to, and more profitable than, those of any pure breed. It is also admissible as the foundation of a systematic and well-considered attempt to establish a new breed. But when crossing is practised injudiciously and indiscriminately, and especially when so done for the purpose of procuring _breeding animals_, it is scarcely less objectionable than careless in-and-in breeding. [Illustration: A SPRIGHTLY YOUTH.] The profitable style of breeding for the great majority of farmers to ado
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77  
78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

breeding

 
animals
 

practice

 

practised

 

purpose

 

common

 

crossing

 

relatives

 
degeneracy
 

majority


profitable

 

knowledge

 

obtained

 

needful

 

accomplish

 
possesses
 

getters

 

fixing

 
defined
 

related


animal

 

desirable

 

quality

 

perpetuating

 
valuable
 

breeder

 

procuring

 

scarcely

 

indiscriminately

 

establish


injudiciously

 

objectionable

 
farmers
 
SPRIGHTLY
 

careless

 

Illustration

 

attempt

 

considered

 

strong

 

Judiciously


advantage

 
perfect
 

health

 

development

 

offers

 

admissible

 

foundation

 

systematic

 
providing
 
butcher