FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  
ileges of the Serbian Church did not extend to the Roumanians. The Serbs had, from the beginning of the thirteenth century, been founding monasteries, and, although about twenty were secularized or affiliated to others by Maria Theresa, yet there remained eleven in the Banat and one, Hodosh, to the north of the Maro[vs]; and as the Roumanians had no monasteries at all they were received as guests in some of these. And so things continued for about a hundred years. SERBS ASSIST THE BULGARIAN RENASCENCE While the Serbs were flourishing, ecclesiastically, in the Banat, the Bulgars had been painfully keeping alive, until 1767, their lonely Patriarchate at Ochrida. Time and again the Greek Patriarch at Constantinople had tried to suppress it, at first on account of cupidity and afterwards, say the Bulgars, for fear lest it should help to arouse the Bulgarian national spirit; but that spirit had fallen to such a depth that the second edition of a comparative lexicon of the Slav languages, which was issued, at the behest of the Empress Catharine in 1791, makes no mention of Bulgarian, and in 1814 the Slavist Dobrovsky regarded Bulgarian as a form of Serbian. And yet, say the Bulgars, the national spirit survived so wonderfully by those far waters of Macedonia that even when the Greek language was introduced into the offices and the Church administration, and when Greeks had usurped the throne of St. Clement, they still found it possible to stand out for the independence of their Church, which handed on the memories of the Bulgarian past. We must be allowed to be sceptical--the town of Ochrida in the fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth centuries is said by contemporary writers to be now in Serbian, now in Bulgarian, now in Macedonian territory. And the very observant Patriarch Brki['c] of the eighteenth century tells us, in a calm, passionless description of the diocese, which he wrote in exile--he was the last Patriarch of Pe['c]--that the inhabitants of a place called Rekalije, in the district of Djakovica, are not Albanians but Serbs and Bulgars who had been, a short time before, converted to Islam. It seems probable that the sharp divisions of Serb, Bulgar, and so on, did not then exist, and that the Greek Patriarch at Constantinople did himself not know what variety of reprehensible Slav it was that lived in those parts.... The last Patriarch of Ochrida, whose name was likewise Arsenius, spent the remainder of his l
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85  
86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Bulgarian
 

Patriarch

 

Bulgars

 

spirit

 

Ochrida

 
Church
 

Serbian

 

Roumanians

 

monasteries

 

century


national

 

Constantinople

 

contemporary

 

offices

 
observant
 

administration

 

Macedonian

 
Greeks
 
territory
 

writers


sixteenth
 

handed

 
memories
 

independence

 

Clement

 

allowed

 

usurped

 

seventeenth

 

centuries

 

fifteenth


sceptical

 
throne
 
inhabitants
 

Bulgar

 

probable

 

divisions

 

variety

 

reprehensible

 

remainder

 

Arsenius


likewise

 

diocese

 

description

 

passionless

 
called
 

converted

 

Albanians

 
Rekalije
 
district
 

Djakovica