FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   >>   >|  
name. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 12: Il. xiv. 86.] [Footnote 13: _Civica corona_. The civic crown was made of oak leaves, and was given only to him who had saved the life of a fellow-citizen in war.] [Footnote 14: Interreges were appointed when there were no consuls, to hold comitia for the election of new ones.] [Footnote 15: Vessels of five banks of oars.] [Footnote 16: Hexapylon, the place with six gates.] THE COMPARISON OF PELOPIDAS WITH MARCELLUS. I. The particulars which we thought worth extracting from the histories of Pelopidas and Marcellus are related above. Their dispositions and habits were so nearly identical (for both were brave, laborious, and high-spirited) that the only point in which they differ appears to be that Marcellus put the inhabitants of several captured cities to the sword, whereas Epameinondas and Pelopidas never slew any one after they had conquered him, nor enslaved any captured city; indeed, had they been alive, it is said that the Thebans never would have so treated the town of Orchomenus. As to their exploits, that of Marcellus against the Gauls was great and wonderful, when he drove before him with his little band of horsemen so great a multitude of horse and foot together, the like of which one cannot easily find to have been done by any other general, and the killing of the chief of the enemy. The same thing was attempted by Pelopidas, but the despot was too quick for him, and he perished without succeeding in his effort. Yet with these we may compare his deeds at Leuktra and Tegyra, the most important and glorious of all his feats of arms, while we have no exploit of Marcellus which corresponds to his management of the ambuscade by which he brought back the exiled popular party to Thebes, and destroyed the despots. Indeed, of all deeds performed by secrecy and stratagem, this takes the van. Hannibal, no doubt, was a terrible enemy to Rome, as were the Lacedaemonians to Thebes; yet it is an established fact that at Tegyra and at Leuktra they gave way before Pelopidas, whereas Marcellus, according to Polybius, never once defeated Hannibal, but that general appears to have remained undefeated until the time of Scipio. But we believe, following Livy, Caesar, Cornelius Nepos, and, among Greek historians, king Juba, that Hannibal suffered some defeats at the hands of Marcellus; yet they never produced any signal result, and we may suspect that the African sometimes o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82  
83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Marcellus
 

Footnote

 
Pelopidas
 
Hannibal
 

captured

 

Leuktra

 

Thebes

 

appears

 

Tegyra

 
general

easily

 

attempted

 
glorious
 
exploit
 
corresponds
 

management

 
important
 
despot
 

effort

 

succeeding


killing

 

perished

 

compare

 

performed

 

Caesar

 
Cornelius
 
undefeated
 

Scipio

 

historians

 

suspect


result
 
African
 

signal

 

produced

 
suffered
 
defeats
 

remained

 

defeated

 

Indeed

 
secrecy

stratagem

 

despots

 

destroyed

 
brought
 

exiled

 
popular
 

Polybius

 

established

 

terrible

 

Lacedaemonians