FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  
[Footnote 168: p. 15 (see Appendix I _infra_).] [Footnote 169: p. 16 (_ibid._).] [Footnote 170: _Correspondence_, No. 5. Sir E. Grey to Sir M. de Bunsen, July 24. The text is also given in the German White Book (pp. 18-23), which will be found in Appendix I.] [Footnote 171: _Ibid_. No. 14. Sir E. Grey to Sir F. Bertie, July 25.] [Footnote 172: _Ibid_. No. 4. Communicated by Count Mensdorff, July 24.] [Footnote 173: _Correspondence_, No. 39. Communicated by the Servian Minister, July 27. See also German White Book (pp. 23-32), _infra_ in Appendix I.] [Footnote 174: German White Book, pp. 24 _et sqq_.; see _infra_ Appendix I.] [Footnote 175: _Correspondence_, No. 5. Sir E. Grey to Sir M. de Bunsen, July 24.] [Footnote 176: German White Book, pp. 29 _et sqq_.; see _infra_ Appendix I.] [Footnote 177: _Correspondence_, No. 64. Sir R. Rodd to Sir E. Grey, July 28.] [Footnote 178: _Ibid_. No. 41. Sir M. de Bunsen to Sir E. Grey, July 27.] CHAPTER VI THE NEW GERMAN THEORY OF THE STATE The war in which England is now engaged with Germany is fundamentally a war between two different principles--that of _raison d'etat_, and that of the rule of law. The antagonism between these two principles appeared in our own internal history as far back as the seventeenth century, when the Stuarts championed the theory of state-necessity and the practice of a prerogative free to act outside and above the law in order to meet the demands of state-necessity, and when Parliament defended the rule of law and sought to include the Crown under that law. The same antagonism now appears externally in a struggle between two nations, one of which claims a prerogative to act outside and above the public law of Europe in order to secure the 'safety' of its own state, while the other stands for the rule of public law. The one regards international covenants to which it has pledged its own word as 'scraps of paper' when they stand in the way of _salus populi_; the other regards the maintenance of such covenants as a grave and inevitable obligation. Taught by Treitschke, whom they regard as their great national historian, and whose lectures on _Politik_ have become a gospel, the Germans of to-day assume as an ultimate end and a final standard what they regard as the national German state.[179] 'The state', says Treitschke, 'is the highest thing in the external society of man: above it there is nothing at all in the his
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 
German
 

Appendix

 
Correspondence
 

Bunsen

 

principles

 
public
 

covenants

 

regard

 

national


prerogative

 
necessity
 

Treitschke

 

antagonism

 

Communicated

 

scraps

 

pledged

 
maintenance
 

populi

 

international


claims

 

Europe

 

nations

 

externally

 

struggle

 
secure
 
safety
 

stands

 
inevitable
 

obligation


ultimate
 

assume

 

standard

 

external

 
society
 

highest

 

Germans

 

gospel

 
appears
 

Taught


historian

 
Politik
 

lectures

 

Germany

 

fundamentally

 
engaged
 

England

 
Minister
 

Servian

 

raison