FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   >>   >|  
valor preserve itself from every stain of cruelty and the lustre of victory will not be tarnished by inhuman and brutal actions." [Sidenote: Codes and rules of nations.] In addition to these authorities are the regulations and practices of various Governments. In 1512 Henry VIII. issued instructions to the Admiral of the Fleet which accord with our understanding of modern international law. Such has been England's course since. Substantially the same rules were followed in the Russian and Japanese regulations, and probably in the codes or rules of many other nations. The rules recognized and practiced by the United States, among other things, provide: "(10) In the case of an enemy merchantman it may be sunk, but only if it is impossible to take it into port, and provided always that the persons on board are put in a place of safety. (U. S. White Book, European War, No. 3, p. 192.)" [Sidenote: Humane principles in American wars.] These humane principles were practiced both in the war of 1812 and during our own war of 1861-65. Even with all the bitterness (now happily ended and forgotten) and all the difficulties of having no port to which to send a prize, Captain Semmes of the _Alabama_ strictly observed the rule as to human life, even going so far as to release ships because he could not care for the passengers. But we are not confined to American and English precedents and practices. While acting contrary to its official statements, yet the Imperial German Government recognized the same rule as the United States, and prior to the sinking of the _Lusitania_ had not announced any other rule. The war zone proclamation of February 4, 1915, contained no warning that the accepted rule of civilized naval warfare would be discarded by the German Government. Indeed, after the _Lusitania_ was sunk, the German Government did not make any such claim, but in answer to the first American note in reference to the _Lusitania_ the German Foreign Office, per von Jagow, addressed to Ambassador Gerard a note dated May 18, 1915, in which, inter alia, it is stated in connection with the sinking of the British steamer _Falaba_: [Sidenote: The _Falaba_ case.] "In the case of the sinking of the English steamer _Falaba_, the commander of the German submarine had the intention of allowing passengers and crew ample opportunity to save themselves. It was not until the Captain disregarded the order to lay to and took to fl
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

German

 

Falaba

 

sinking

 

American

 

Lusitania

 

Government

 
Sidenote
 
States
 

nations

 

United


recognized

 

practiced

 

passengers

 

Captain

 

principles

 

English

 

steamer

 

practices

 

regulations

 
precedents

confined

 

intention

 

acting

 

disregarded

 

Imperial

 

contrary

 

official

 

statements

 
observed
 

submarine


commander

 

Alabama

 

strictly

 

release

 

discarded

 
Indeed
 

addressed

 

Semmes

 

Ambassador

 

answer


Office

 
reference
 

allowing

 

warfare

 

proclamation

 

February

 
announced
 

Foreign

 

connection

 
stated