FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484  
485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   >>   >|  
hor's _Brahmanism and Hinduism._] [Footnote 108: Born in 1818.] [Footnote 109: _ekam[=a]tr[=a]dvit[=i]ya_ (masculine); with this form contrast below, in the Br[=a]hma Dharma (religion) of Debendran[=a]th, the neuter _ekam ev[=a]dvit[=i]yam_. The only God of the first Sam[=a]j; is a person; that of the reform is exoterically Nature.] [Footnote 110: But, as will be noticed in the four articles (which are in part a compilation of phrases from the Upanishads) the personality of Brahm[=a] is not insisted on for the outer church. For this reason, although the inner church doubtless understands It as He, yet this neuter should be preserved in the translation. The articles are so drawn up as to enable any deist to subscribe (without Vedantic belief as a condition of acceptance) to the essential creed of the Congregation. One or two sentences in the original will reveal at a glance the origin of the phraseology: _brahma_ (being) _v[=a] ekam idam-agra [=a]s[=i]t; tad ida[.m] sarvam as[r.]jal; tad eva nityam, ekam ev[=a]dvit[=i]yam; tasmia pr[=i]tis ... tadup[=a]sanam_. Compare Ch[=a]ndogya Upanishad: _sad_ (being) _idam agra [=a]s[=i]d ekam ev[=a]dvit[=i]yam_; and the V[=a]jasaney[=i]-Br[=a]hmana Upanishad: _brahma v[=a] idam-agra [=a]s[=i]t_, etc.] [Footnote 111: It is interesting to see this fervor, or ecstatic delirium, surviving from the time of the Rig Veda, where already (albeit only in the latest hymns, which are quite Brahmanic) flourishes the mad _muni:_ and fervid ascetism ('heat,'_tapas_) begins to appear as a means of salvation. RV. x. 109, 136.] [Footnote 112: "I regard myself as Christ and C[=a]itanya," reported by Sen's own missionary as the words of the former. Sen's disciples deny some of these assertions, but they seem to be substantiated, and Sen's own language shows that he claimed miraculous powers. Compare the discussions on this point, JRAS. xiii. 281 ff.] [Footnote 113: This was afterwards excused on the ground that the marriage would not have been legal without these rites. But Sen presumably was aware of this in advance. From the performance of the rites he had the decency to absent himself. It should be said, however, in Sen's behalf, that the marriage itself had nothing revolting
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484  
485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

articles

 

marriage

 

brahma

 

Upanishad

 

Compare

 
church
 
neuter
 

Christ

 

regard


disciples

 
missionary
 

itanya

 

reported

 
salvation
 

albeit

 

latest

 
delirium
 

surviving

 

Brahmanic


begins

 

ascetism

 

fervid

 
flourishes
 

advance

 
Brahmanism
 

Hinduism

 

performance

 

behalf

 

revolting


decency

 

absent

 

ground

 

excused

 

claimed

 

miraculous

 

language

 

substantiated

 

ecstatic

 

powers


discussions
 

assertions

 

interesting

 

preserved

 

translation

 

doubtless

 

understands

 

Debendran

 

Vedantic

 

belief