FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324  
325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   >>   >|  
rious crimes burning alive was formerly very wide-spread. It was common among the Romans, being given in the XII. Tables as the special penalty for arson. Under the Gothic codes adulterers were so punished, and throughout the middle ages it was the civil penalty for certain heinous crimes, _e.g._ poisoning, heresy, witchcraft, arson, bestiality and sodomy, and so continued in some cases, nominally at least, till the beginning of the 19th century. In England, under the common law, women condemned for high treason or petty treason (murder of husband, murder of master or mistress, certain offences against the coin, &c.) were burned, this being considered more "decent" than hanging and exposure on a gibbet. In practice the convict was strangled before being burnt. The last woman burnt in England suffered in 1789, the punishment being abolished in 1790. Burning was not included among the penalties for heresy under the Roman imperial codes; but the burning of heretics by orthodox mobs had long been sanctioned by custom before the edicts of the emperor Frederick II. (1222, 1223) made it the civil-law punishment for heresy. His example was followed in France by Louis IX. in the Establishments of 1270. In England, where the civil law was never recognized, the common law took no cognizance of ecclesiastical offences, and the church courts had no power to condemn to death. There were, indeed, in the 12th and 13th centuries isolated instances of the burning of heretics. William of Newburgh describes the burning of certain foreign sectaries in 1169, and early in the 13th century a deacon was burnt by order of the council of Oxford (Foxe ii. 374; cf. Bracton, _de Corona_, ii. 300), but by what legal sanction is not obvious. The right of the crown to issue writs _de haeretico comburendo_, claimed for it by later jurists, was based on that issued by Henry IV. in 1400 for the burning of William Sawtre; but Sir James Stephen (_Hist. Crim. Law_) points out that this was issued "with the assent of the lords temporal," which seems to prove that the crown had no right under the common law to issue such writs. The burning of heretics was actually made legal in England by the statute _de haeretico comburendo_ (1400), passed ten days after the issue of the above writ. This was repealed in 1533, but the Six Articles Act of 1539 revived burning as a penalty [v.04 p.0855] for denying transubstantiation. Under Queen Mary the acts of Henry IV. and He
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324  
325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

burning

 

common

 
England
 

heresy

 

heretics

 
penalty
 
offences
 
century
 

William

 

treason


comburendo
 

punishment

 

haeretico

 
issued
 
murder
 
crimes
 
Oxford
 

denying

 

Bracton

 
transubstantiation

Corona

 

council

 

deacon

 

centuries

 

condemn

 
isolated
 

instances

 

sectaries

 

revived

 

foreign


Newburgh

 

describes

 
obvious
 

courts

 

Stephen

 

statute

 

temporal

 
points
 

Sawtre

 

passed


claimed

 

Articles

 

assent

 

repealed

 

jurists

 
sanction
 
custom
 

beginning

 

nominally

 

bestiality