devoured by
hunger, there existed a party of zealots, led by those whom Jeanne
fondly called the Royal Blood.[1619] They were the Duke of Alencon, the
Duke of Bourbon, the Count of Vendome, and likewise the Duke of Bar,
who had just come from the War of the Apple Baskets.[1620] Before he
took to painting pictures and writing moralities in rhyme, this young
son of the Lady Yolande had been a warrior. Duke of Bar and heir of
Lorraine, he had been forced to join the English and Burgundians.
Brother-in-law of King Charles, he must needs rejoice when the latter
was victorious, because, but for that victory, he would never have
been able to range himself on the side of the Queen, his sister, for
which he would have been very sorry.[1621] Jeanne knew him; not long
before, she had asked the Duke of Lorraine to send him with her into
France.[1622] He was said to have been one of those who of their own
free will followed her to Paris. Among the others were the two sons of
the Lady of Laval, Gui, the eldest to whom she had offered wine at
Selles-en-Berry, promising soon to give him to drink at Paris, and
Andre, who afterwards became Marshal of Loheac.[1623] This was the army
of the Maid: a band of youths, scarcely more than children, who ranged
their banners side by side with the banner of a girl younger than
they, but more innocent and better.
[Footnote 1619: _Trial_, vol. iii, p. 91.]
[Footnote 1620: _Guerre de la Hottee de Pommes_, cf. vol. i, p. 92.
(W.S.)]
[Footnote 1621: _Chronique du doyen de Saint-Thibaut de Metz_ in D.
Calmet. _Histoire de Lorraine_, vol. v, orig. docs., cols, xli-xlvii.
Villeneuve-Bargemont, _Precis historique de la vie du roi Rene_, Aix,
1820, in 8vo. Lecoy de la Marche, _Le roi Rene_, Paris, 1875, 2 vols.
in 8vo. Vallet de Viriville, in _Nouvelle biographie generale_, 1866,
xli, pp. 1009-1015.]
[Footnote 1622: _Trial_, vol. ii, p. 444. S. Luce, _Jeanne d'Arc a
Domremy_, p. cxcix. Morosini, vol. iii, p. 156, note 3.]
[Footnote 1623: _Trial_, vol. v, pp. 105-111.]
On learning that the retreat had been cut off, it is said that these
youthful princes were well content and glad.[1624] This was valour and
zeal; but it was a curious position and a false when the knighthood
wished for war while the royal council was desiring to treat, and when
the knighthood actually rejoiced at the campaign being prolonged by
the enemy and at the royal army being cornered by the _Godons_.
Unhappily this war part
|