FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822  
823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   >>   >|  
ent in behalf of their enfranchisement; they have offered no petition or plea or even given sign that the extension of suffrage to them would be acceptable. Yet American women, who have conducted a persistent, intelligent movement for a half-century, which has grown stronger and stronger with the years, appealing for their own enfranchisement and supported now by a petition of 400,000 citizens of the United States are told that it is unnecessary to consider their plea since all women do not want to vote! Gentlemen, is it not manifestly unfair to demand of women a test which has never been made in the case of men in this or any other country? Is it not true that the attitude of the Government toward an unenfranchised class of men has ever been that the vote is a privilege to be extended and it is optional with the citizen whether or not he shall use it? If any proof is needed it can be found in the fact that the U. S. Government has no record whatever of the number who have been naturalized in this country. It has no record of the number of Indians who have accepted its offer of the vote as a reward for taking up land in severalty. Manifestly the Government, as represented by Congress and the State Legislatures, considers it entirely unnecessary to know whether men who have had the suffrage "thrust upon them" use it or not, but imperative that women must not only demand it in very large numbers but give guaranty that they will use it, before its extension shall be made to them. Is it not likewise unfair to compel women to seek their enfranchisement by methods infinitely more difficult than those by means of which any man in this country has secured his right to a vote? Ordinary fair play should compel every believer in democracy and individual liberty, no matter what are his views on woman suffrage, to grant to women the easiest process of enfranchisement and that is the submission of a Federal Amendment. APPENDIX TO CHAPTER XIV. THE SHAFROTH-PALMER WOMAN SUFFRAGE AMENDMENT. In 1914 the Congressional Committee of the National American Woman Suffrage Association, of which Mrs. Medill McCormick was chairman and Mrs. Antoinette Funk vice-chairman, caused to be introduced in Congress, with the sanction of the National Board, a Federal Amendment for woman suffrage radically different from the one for which the association had been working since 1869. It was named for its introducers in Senate and House. The merit
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822  
823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

enfranchisement

 

suffrage

 
country
 

Government

 

Federal

 

demand

 

number

 
unfair
 

record

 

National


unnecessary

 

Congress

 

petition

 

extension

 
American
 

Amendment

 

stronger

 

compel

 

chairman

 

matter


liberty

 

democracy

 
individual
 
secured
 
methods
 

infinitely

 
difficult
 

likewise

 
guaranty
 
Ordinary

believer
 

sanction

 
radically
 
introduced
 

caused

 

Antoinette

 
Senate
 
introducers
 

association

 
working

McCormick

 

Medill

 

SHAFROTH

 

PALMER

 

CHAPTER

 

process

 
submission
 

APPENDIX

 
SUFFRAGE
 

Suffrage