FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833  
834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   >>   >|  
have not only made no demand for the vote but they have never been asked to give any evidence of capacity to use it intelligently. We turned again to history to see how the men who lived in this country in 1800 got their votes. At that time 8 per cent. of the total population were voters in New York as compared with 25 per cent. now. There was a struggle in all the colonial States to broaden the suffrage. New York seemed always to have lagged behind the others and therefore it forms a good example. It was next to the last State to remove the land qualification and it was not a leader in the extension of the suffrage to any class. In 1740 the British Parliament disqualified the Catholics for naturalization in this country. That enactment had been preceded in several of the States by their definite disfranchisement. In 1699 they were disfranchised by an Act of the Assembly of New York. Although the writers on the early franchise say that Jews were not permitted to vote anywhere in this country in 1701, as they certainly were not in England, yet occasionally they apparently did so. In New York that year there was a definite enactment disfranchising them. In 1737 the Assembly passed another disfranchising Act. Catholics and Jews were disfranchised in most States. It is interesting to learn how they became enfranchised. One would naturally suppose that together or separately they would make some great demand for political equality with Protestants but there is no record that they did. I find that the reason why our country became so liberal to them was not because there was any demand on their part and not because there was any special advocacy of their enfranchisement by statesmen. It was due to the fact that in the Revolution, Great Britain, having difficulty with the American colonies on the south side of the St. Lawrence River, did as every belligerent country does and tried to hold Canada by granting her favors. In order to make the Canadian colonies secure against revolution the British Parliament, which had previously disfranchised the Catholics and the Jews, now extended a vote to them. The American Constitution makers could not do less than Great Britain had done, and so in every one of the thirteen States they were guaranteed pol
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833  
834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

country

 

States

 
demand
 

Catholics

 

disfranchised

 

Britain

 

suffrage

 
colonies
 

American

 

definite


disfranchising

 

Assembly

 

British

 

Parliament

 
enactment
 

separately

 

revolution

 

secure

 

Protestants

 

record


Canadian

 

political

 
equality
 
interesting
 
Constitution
 

makers

 
extended
 

enfranchised

 
suppose
 
naturally

previously
 

difficulty

 
thirteen
 
Canada
 

Revolution

 

Lawrence

 
guaranteed
 
reason
 

favors

 
belligerent

liberal

 

enfranchisement

 

statesmen

 

advocacy

 

special

 

granting

 
population
 

voters

 
compared
 

lagged