FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182  
183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>   >|  
he exemption of certain persons from these, the award of pardon for crimes,... the creation of nobles, the foundation of universities,... the assembling of the etats-generaux or provinciaux, etc."--Bossuet, "Politique tiree de l'Ecriture sainte": The entire state exists in the person of the prince."--Louis XIV., "aeuvres," I., 50 (to his son): "You should be aware that kings can naturally dispose fully and freely of all possessions belonging as well to persons of the church as to laymen, to make use of at all times with wise economy, that is to say, according to the general requirements of their government."--Sorel, "L'Europe et la Revolution francaise," I., 231 (Letter of the "intendant" Foucault): "It is an illusion, which cannot proceed from anything but blind preoccupation, that of making any distinction between obligations of conscience and the obedience which is due to the King."] [Footnote 2315: "The Ancient Regime," p.9 and following pages.--"Correspondance de Mirabeau et du Comte de le Marck," II., 74 (Note by Mirabeau, July 3, 1790): "Previous to the present revolution, royal authority was incomplete: the king was compelled to humor his nobles, to treat with the parliaments,, to be prodigal of favors to the court."] [Footnote 2316: "The Revolution," III., p.318. (Laff.II. p. 237-238).--" The Ancient Regime," p. 10 (Laff. I. 25n.) Speech by the Chancellor Seguier, 1775: "Our kings have themselves declared that they are fortunately powerless to attack property."] [Footnote 2317: Rousseau's text in the "Contrat Social."--On the meaning and effect of this principle cf "The Revolution," I., 217 and following pages, and III., book VI., ch. I. Laff. 182-186 et II. 47 to 74).] [Footnote 2318: The opinion, or rather the resignation which confers omnipotence on the central power, goes back to the second half of the fifteenth century, after the Hundred Years' war, and is due to that war; the omnipotence of the king was then the only refuge against the English invaders, and the ravages of the Ecorcheurs.--Cf. Fortescue, "In leges Angliae," and" "The Difference between an Absolute and a Limited Monarchy" (end of the fifteenth century), on the difference at this date between the English and the French government.--The same decision is found in the dispatches of the Venetian ambassadors of this date: "In France everything is based on the will of the king. Nobody, whatever might be his conscientious scruples, would da
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182  
183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Revolution

 

century

 
English
 
fifteenth
 
Ancient
 

government

 

omnipotence

 

Regime

 

nobles


persons
 
Mirabeau
 

Social

 

meaning

 

principle

 

Contrat

 

effect

 

Seguier

 

declared

 

powerless


attack
 

property

 

Chancellor

 
fortunately
 

Rousseau

 
Speech
 
French
 

difference

 

decision

 

Monarchy


Difference

 

Angliae

 
Absolute
 
Limited
 

dispatches

 
Venetian
 

conscientious

 

scruples

 

Nobody

 

France


ambassadors

 

Fortescue

 
central
 

confers

 
favors
 
resignation
 

opinion

 

invaders

 
ravages
 

Ecorcheurs