FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  
us impulses generated in the receptive organs by environmental agents as stimuli. In other words, whatever the nature of the agent, its result on the receptive organs enters the central nervous organ as a nervous impulse, and all segments of the central nervous organ receive impulses so generated. Further, it is not known that nervous impulses present qualitative differences among themselves. It is with these impulses that the central nervous organ whether spinal cord or brain has to deal. _Material and Psychical Signs of Cerebral Activity._--In the central nervous organ the action resulting from entrant impulses has issue in three kinds of ways. The reaction may die out, be suppressed, and so far as discoverable lead to nothing; or the impulses may evoke effect in either or both of two forms. Just as from the receptive organs, nerves lead into the central nervous organ, so conversely from the central organ other nerves, termed _efferent_, lead to various organs of the body, especially glands and muscles. The reaction of the central nervous organ to impulses poured into it commonly leads to a discharge of impulses from it into glands and muscles. These centrifugal impulses are, so far as is known, qualitatively like the centripetal impulses. On reaching the glands and muscles they influence the activity of those organs. Since those organs are therefore the mechanisms in which the ultimate effect of the nervous reaction takes place, they are often termed from this point of view _effector organs_. A change ensuing in effector organs is often the only sign an observer has that a nervous reaction has occurred, unless the nervous system under observation be the observer's own. If the observer turns to his own nervous system for evidence of reaction, he meets at once in numberless instances with _sensation_ as an outcome or sign of its reaction. This effect he cannot show to any being beside himself. He can only describe it, and in describing it he cannot strictly translate it into any term of material existence. The unbridged gulf between sensation and the changes produced in effector organs necessitates a separate handling of the functions of the nervous system according as their office under consideration is sensation or material effect. This holds especially in the case of the brain, and for the following reasons. _Psychosis and the Fore-Brain._--Hippocrates wrote, "It is through the brain that we become mad, that d
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144  
145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

nervous

 

impulses

 

organs

 
central
 
reaction
 

effect

 

system

 

sensation

 
observer
 

effector


glands
 

muscles

 

receptive

 

nerves

 

termed

 

material

 

generated

 

evidence

 
numberless
 

observation


Psychosis

 

change

 

ensuing

 

environmental

 

instances

 

occurred

 

Hippocrates

 

reasons

 

existence

 

translate


describing

 

strictly

 
unbridged
 

separate

 

handling

 

necessitates

 

produced

 
describe
 
outcome
 

consideration


office

 
functions
 

action

 

resulting

 
Activity
 
Cerebral
 

Material

 

Psychical

 

entrant

 

nature