FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385  
386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   >>   >|  
a godly and commendable form; that the king was a complete sovereign in his minority; that the law of the six articles was justly repealed; and that the king had full authority to correct and reform what was amiss in ecclesiastical discipline, government, or doctrine. The bishop was willing to set his hand to all the articles except the first: he maintained his conduct to have been inoffensive; and declared, that he would not own himself guilty of faults which he had never committed.[**] * Heylin, p. 99. ** Collier, vol. ii. p, 305., from the council books. Heylin, p. 99. The council, finding that he had gone such lengths, were determined to prevent his full compliance by multiplying the difficulties upon him, and sending him new articles to subscribe. A list was selected of such points as they thought would be the hardest of digestion; and, not content with this rigor, they also insisted on his submission, and his acknowledgment of past errors. To make this subscription more mortifying, they demanded a promise, that he would recommend and publish all these articles from the pulpit: but Gardiner, who saw that they intended either to ruin or dishonor him, or perhaps both, determined not to gratify his enemies by any further compliance: he still maintained his innocence; desired a fair trial; and refused to subscribe more articles till he should recover his liberty. For this pretended offence his bishopric was put under sequestration for three months; and as he then appeared no more compliant than before, a commission was appointed to try, or, more properly speaking, to condemn him. {1551.} The commissioners were, the primate, the bishops of London, Ely, and Lincoln, Secretary Petre, Sir James Hales, and some other lawyers. Gardiner objected to the legality of the commission, which was not founded on any statute or precedent; and he appealed from the commissioners to the king. His appeal was not regarded: sentence was pronounced against him; he was deprived of his bishopric, and committed to close custody; his books and papers were seized; he was secluded from all company; and it was not allowed him either to send or receive any letters or messages.[*] Gardiner, as well as the other prelates, had agreed to hold his office during the king's pleasure: but the council, unwilling to make use of a concession which had been so illegally and arbitrarily extorted, chose rather to employ some forms of jus
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385  
386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
articles
 

Gardiner

 
council
 

commission

 

committed

 

determined

 
subscribe
 

commissioners

 
compliance
 
Heylin

bishopric

 

maintained

 

primate

 

liberty

 

offence

 
pretended
 

London

 

Secretary

 

refused

 

Lincoln


recover

 

bishops

 
compliant
 

appeared

 
months
 

sequestration

 
properly
 

speaking

 

appointed

 
employ

condemn
 

lawyers

 

company

 

unwilling

 

allowed

 

secluded

 

seized

 

custody

 

papers

 

pleasure


prelates

 

agreed

 

receive

 
letters
 
messages
 

deprived

 

concession

 

legality

 

founded

 
statute