FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304  
305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   >>   >|  
with which He fulfilled the Law for us; thereupon, one also receives the Holy Spirit, who effects and fulfils in us the righteousness required by the Law, here in this life imperfectly and perfectly in the life to come." (Preger 1, 387.) At the synod of Eisenach, 1556, the theologians accordingly declared: "Although it is true that grace and the gift through grace cannot be separated, but are always together, nevertheless the gift of the Holy Spirit is not a piece or part, much less a co-cause of justification and salvation, but an appendix, a consequence, and an additional gift of grace.-- _Wiewohl es wahr ist, dass gratia und donum per gratiam nicht koennen getrennt werden, sondern allezeit beieinander sind, so ist doch die Gabe des Heiligen Geistes nicht ein Stueck oder Teil, viel weniger eine Mitursache der Justifikation und Salvation, sondern ist ein Anhang, Folge und Zugab be der Gnade._" (Seeberg 4, 487.) 147. Attitude of Anti-Majorists. With the exception of Menius and other adherents in Electoral Saxony, Major was firmly opposed by Lutheran ministers and theologians everywhere. Even when he was still their superintendent, the ministers of Mansfeld took issue with him; and after he was dismissed by Count Albrecht, they drafted an _Opinion,_ in which they declared that Major's proposition obscures the doctrine of God's grace and Christ's merit. Also the clergy of Luebeck, Hamburg, Lueneburg, and Magdeburg united in an _Opinion,_ in which they rejected Major's proposition. Chief among the theologians who opposed him were, as stated, Amsdorf, Flacius, Wigand, Gallus, Moerlin and Chemnitz. In their publications they unanimously denounced the proposition that good works are necessary to salvation, and its equivalents, as dangerous, godless, blasphemous, and popish. Yet before the controversy they themselves had not all nor always been consistent and correct in their terminology. The _Formula of Concord_ says: "Before this controversy quite a few pure teachers employed such and similar expressions [that faith is preserved by good works, etc.] in the exposition of the Holy Scriptures, in no way, however, intending thereby to confirm the above-mentioned errors of the Papists." (949, 36.) Concerning the word "faith," 1549, Flacius, for example had said that our effort to obey God might be called a "_causa sine qua non,_ or something which serves salvation." His words are: "Atque hinc apparet, quatenus nostrum studi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304  
305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

theologians

 

salvation

 

proposition

 

Spirit

 
opposed
 

Flacius

 

ministers

 

controversy

 
Opinion
 

declared


sondern
 
equivalents
 

popish

 

denounced

 

godless

 

blasphemous

 

dangerous

 

stated

 

Hamburg

 

Luebeck


Lueneburg
 

Magdeburg

 

united

 

clergy

 

obscures

 

doctrine

 
Christ
 
rejected
 

Moerlin

 
Chemnitz

publications

 

Gallus

 
Wigand
 

Amsdorf

 

unanimously

 
Before
 
effort
 

called

 

Concerning

 

apparet


quatenus

 

nostrum

 

serves

 
Papists
 

errors

 
teachers
 

employed

 

terminology

 

correct

 
Formula