FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565  
566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   >>   >|  
esent day, not a shred of convincing evidence has been produced showing that Luther ever wavered in this position, or changed his doctrine of grace. Luther's extensive reference to _De Servo Arbitrio_ in his _Commentary on Genesis_, from which we freely quoted above, has frequently been interpreted as a quasi-retraction. But according to the _Formula of Concord_ these expositions of Luther's merely "repeat and explain" his former position. They certainly do not offer any corrections of his former fundamental views. Luther does not speak of any errors of his own, but of errors of others which they would endeavor to corroborate by quoting from his books--"_post meam mortem multi meos libros proferrent in medium et inde omnis generis errores et deliria sua confirmabunt_." Moreover, he declares that he is innocent if some should misuse his statements concerning necessity and the hidden God, because he had expressly added that we must not search the hidden majesty of God, but look upon the revealed God to judge of His disposition toward us-- "_addidi, quod aspiciendus sit Deus revelatus.... Ideo sum excusatus_." (CONC. TRIGL., 898.) Luther's entire theological activity, before as well as after 1525, was an application of the principle stressed also in _De Servo Arbitrio, viz._, that we must neither deny nor investigate or be concerned about the hidden God, but study God as He has revealed Himself in the Gospel and firmly rely on His gracious promises in the means of grace. 252. Luther's Doctrine Approved by Formula of Concord. Flacius, who himself did not deny the universality of grace, declared at the colloquy in Weimar, 1560, that, when taken in their context, Luther's statements in _De Servo Arbitrio_ contained no inapt expressions (_nihil incommodi_). He added: "I do not want to be the reformer of Luther, but let us leave the judgment and discussion concerning this book to the Church of sound doctrine. _Nolo reformator esse Lutheri, sed iudicium et discussionem istius libri permittamus sanae ecclesiae_." (Planck 4, 704, Frank 4, 255.) In Article II of the _Formula of Concord_ the Church passed on Luther's book on the bondage of the will together with his declarations in his _Commentary on Genesis_. In referring to this matter the _Formula_ gives utterance to the following thoughts: 1. that in _De Servo Arbitrio_ Luther "elucidated and supported this position [on free will, occupied also by the _Formula of Corcord_]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565  
566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Luther

 

Formula

 

Arbitrio

 

Concord

 

hidden

 

position

 
statements
 

Church

 
doctrine
 

errors


Commentary

 
revealed
 
Genesis
 
Corcord
 

universality

 
Weimar
 

colloquy

 
Flacius
 

declared

 

investigate


concerned
 

stressed

 

application

 

principle

 

promises

 

Doctrine

 

gracious

 

Himself

 
Gospel
 

firmly


Approved

 

Article

 

passed

 

supported

 

ecclesiae

 

Planck

 

occupied

 

bondage

 
matter
 
utterance

referring
 

thoughts

 
declarations
 
elucidated
 

permittamus

 
reformer
 

judgment

 

incommodi

 

contained

 
expressions