FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597  
598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   >>   >|  
e Lutherans in June, 1557, at Frankfort-on-the-Main. June 30 a resolution was adopted to the effect that all controversies among the Lutherans be suspended, and the Romanists be told at the prospective colloquy that the Lutherans were all agreed in the chief points of doctrine. Against this resolution Nicholas Gallus and several others entered their protest. Self-evidently, also Flacius and his adherents who had always held that the controverted issues involved essential points of doctrine, could not assent to the resolution without violating their conscience, and denying their convictions and the truth as they saw it. Such being the situation, the wise thing for the Lutherans to do would have been to decline the colloquy. For, since also Ducal Saxony with its stanch Lutherans was held to attend it, a public humiliating clash of the Lutherans was unavoidable. Before the formal opening of the colloquy, the Thuringian delegates at Worms received a letter from Flacius, dated August 9, 1557 in which he admonished them to make a determined confession, and to induce the other Lutheran theologians to reject the Interim, Adiaphorism, Majorism, Osiandrism and Zwinglianism. This was necessary, said Flacius, because the Romanists would, no doubt exploit the concessions made in the Leipzig Interim and the dissensions existing among the Lutherans. (_C. R._ 9, l99ff.). Flacius expressed the same views in an opinion to the dukes of Saxony, who, in turn, gave corresponding instructions to their delegates in Worms. In a letter dated August 20, 1557 Duke John Frederick said it was impossible that, in defending the _Augsburg Confession_ against the Romanists, the Lutherans could stand as one man and speak as with one mouth (_fuer einen Mann und also ex uno ore_), if they had not previously come to an agreement among themselves and condemned the errors. For otherwise the Papists would be able to defeat the Lutherans with their own sword, _i.e._, their own polemical publications. (231.) On the same day, August 20, 1557, Flacius repeated his sentiments and admonitions in letters to Schnepf, Moerlin, and Sarcerius. (232ff.) In a meeting of the Lutheran theologians at Worms, held September 5, Dr. Basilius Monner, professor of jurisprudence at Jena made a motion in keeping with his instructions and the admonitions of Flacius, whereupon Erhard Schnepf, professor in Jena, read a list of the errors that ought to be rejected. But the majority,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597  
598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Lutherans

 

Flacius

 

colloquy

 

Romanists

 

August

 

resolution

 
theologians
 

Lutheran

 
Interim
 

admonitions


errors

 
letter
 
delegates
 
Saxony
 

instructions

 
professor
 

doctrine

 
Schnepf
 

points

 

impossible


keeping
 

Frederick

 

jurisprudence

 

Confession

 

Erhard

 

defending

 

Augsburg

 

motion

 
expressed
 

majority


dissensions

 

existing

 

opinion

 

rejected

 

Leipzig

 

defeat

 

September

 

meeting

 
polemical
 
publications

repeated
 

sentiments

 
letters
 
Sarcerius
 

Moerlin

 
Papists
 

Basilius

 

Monner

 

condemned

 
agreement