FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589  
590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   >>   >|  
e by Lutheran princes as well as by theologians, especially the theologians who had not participated in the controversies, but for all that were no less concerned about the maintenance of pure Lutheranism and no less opposed to a peace at the expense of the divine truth than the others. As early as 1553 Flacius and Gallus published their _Provokation oder Erbieten der adiaphorischen Sachen halben, auf Erkenntnis und Urteil der Kirchen_. In this Appeal they urged that ten or twenty competent men who hitherto had not participated in the public controversy be appointed to decide the chief differences between themselves and the Interimists. In the two following years Flacius and Gallus continued their endeavors to interest influential men in Saxony and other places for their plan. Melanchthon and his Wittenberg colleagues, however, maintained silence in the matter. At the behest of the dukes of Thuringia, Amsdorf, Stolz, Aurifaber, Schnepf, and Strigel met at Weimar in the early part of 1553 to discuss the conditions of peace. Opposed as they were to a peace by agreeing to disagree or by ignoring the differences and past contentions, they demanded that synergism, Majorism, adiaphorism, as also the doctrines of Zwingli, Osiander, and Schwenckfeldt, be publicly rejected by the Wittenbergers. (Preger 2, 4. 7.) 268. Pacific Overtures of Flacius. Soon after the convention in Weimar, Gottschalk Praetorius, rector of the school in Magdeburg, and Hubertus Languet from Burgundy (an intimate friend of Melanchthon and a guest at his table, who later on maliciously slandered Flacius) had an interview with Flacius, in which the latter submitted the conditions on which peace might be established. However, a letter written in this matter by Praetorius, in April, 1556, was not answered by Melanchthon, who, moreover, insinuated that Flacius's object merely was to kindle hatred. (_C. R._ 8, 794.) In May, 1556, Flacius, continuing his peace efforts, forwarded to Paul Eber his "Mild Proposals, _Linde Vorschlaege_, dadurch man gottselige und notwendige friedliche Vergleichung machen koennte zwischen den Wittenbergischen und Leipzigischen Theologen in causa Adiaphoristica und den andern, so wider sie geschrieben haben." According to these _Proposals_, Flacius demanded that, in a publication signed by the theologians of both parties, the Pope be denounced as the true Antichrist, the Augsburg Interim be rejected, the proposition: "Good wo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589  
590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Flacius

 

theologians

 

Melanchthon

 

Gallus

 

conditions

 

Proposals

 
differences
 

matter

 
Weimar
 

Praetorius


participated

 
rejected
 
demanded
 
Gottschalk
 

kindle

 
intimate
 

written

 
friend
 

convention

 

object


insinuated
 

Overtures

 

answered

 

letter

 

However

 

Hubertus

 

interview

 

Languet

 
slandered
 

maliciously


Magdeburg

 

school

 

established

 

rector

 

submitted

 

Burgundy

 

geschrieben

 

According

 
publication
 
Adiaphoristica

andern
 

signed

 
Interim
 
proposition
 

Augsburg

 
Antichrist
 

parties

 

denounced

 

Theologen

 
Leipzigischen