FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257  
258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   >>   >|  
national income to investment. Growth rates in the 1966-70 period were somewhat lower than in the preceding five years, with the exception of agriculture, the performance of which was slightly better. The predominant growth of industry has been a direct consequence of the leadership's policy. This policy was reflected in a disproportionately large allocation of investment to industry at the expense of other economic sectors. In the 1966-70 period, for instance, industry received 55 percent of total investment--60 percent if the construction industry is included--compared to less than 13 percent granted to agriculture. Within industry preponderant emphasis has been placed on the development of the capital goods sector at the expense of consumer goods. Whereas total industrial output increased at an average annual rate of 11.8 percent from 1966 to 1970, production of capital goods rose at a rate of 12.7 percent, and production of consumer goods grew by only 9.5 percent annually. As a consequence of the uneven sectoral growth, the structure of the economy changed significantly between 1960 and 1970. According to official data the contribution of industry to the net material product rose from 44 to 61 percent, whereas that of agriculture declined from 33 to 20 percent (see table 4). The relative importance of construction and transport rose slightly, but that of trade declined by half. A strikingly different structure of the economy emerges in terms of the Western concept of gross national product (GNP), which includes housing and services and treats both taxes and subsidies in a different manner. The contribution of industry was less than that of agriculture in 1960, but by 1967 it had increased more rapidly than is indicated by the official data (see table 5). The role of agriculture, on the other hand, declined more rapidly. _Table 4._ _National Income (Net Material Product) of Romania, by Economic Sector, 1960, 1967, and 1970_ (in percent) ---------------------------------------------------------- Economic Sector 1960 1967 1970 ---------------------------------------------------------- Industry and handicrafts 44.1 51.7 60.8 Construction 9.0 8.4 9.6 Agriculture 33.1 28.6 20.0 Transport and communications 3.8 4.2 4.2 Trade 6.5 4.6
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257  
258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
percent
 

industry

 

agriculture

 

declined

 

investment

 

consumer

 

capital

 

Sector

 

increased

 
economy

construction

 

product

 

Economic

 

official

 

rapidly

 

contribution

 

structure

 
production
 
period
 
consequence

policy

 

expense

 

growth

 

national

 

slightly

 

housing

 

importance

 

includes

 
services
 

treats


subsidies
 
manner
 

strikingly

 
emerges
 
transport
 
concept
 

Western

 

preceding

 
Construction
 
Growth

Industry
 

handicrafts

 

income

 
Agriculture
 
communications
 

Transport

 

Romania

 

Product

 

relative

 

Material