FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470  
471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   >>   >|  
any control of him. I request said Susan and Lucy to use said fund thus given to further what is called the woman's rights cause; but neither of them is under any legal responsibility to any one or any court to do so." The will further alleged that this residue was substantially the estate received from Francis Jackson; that the will was intended by the testatrix to defeat the decision of this court, before mentioned; that the testatrix had no personal acquaintance with Lucy Stone or Susan B. Anthony; that said gift was intended as a gift _in perpetuam_ to the said cause, and was, without limit of time, upon trust in favor of said cause; and that said cause was not a charity within the meaning of the law, and was null and void. The defendants demurred to the bill for want of equity. The case was heard by C. Allen, _J._, on the bill and demurrer, and a decree was entered sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the bill. The plaintiffs appealed to the full court. R. M. MORSE, Jr., and S. J. ELDER, for the plaintiffs. B. F. BUTLER and F. L. WASHBURN, for the defendants. Judge CHARLES DEVENS. The fact that the respective portions of the estate bequeathed by Mrs. Eddy to Mrs. Stone and Miss Anthony were in amount equal to-or precisely the same as those which came to her by descent from her father, Francis Jackson, is not of importance in the case at bar. It had been held in _Jackson vs. Phillips, 14 Allen, 539_, that a certain bequest made by Mr. Jackson in trust was not, legally speaking, a public charity, and that it could not therefore pass to the beneficiaries named in his will. The property which he thus attempted to bequeath descended therefore to his legal representatives, of whom Mrs. Eddy was one. She received it with the same right to deal with it or dispose of it in her lifetime, or by will at her decease, that she had in any other estate which was her lawful property. The bill alleges "that said will was intended by the testatrix to defeat the decision of the court, before mentioned; that the testatrix had no personal acquaintance with Lucy Stone or Susan B. Anthony; that said gift was intended as a gift _in perpetuam_ to the said cause." But if Mrs. Eddy has complied with the rules of law in the disposition of her prope
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470  
471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

intended

 
testatrix
 
Jackson
 

estate

 

Anthony

 

personal

 

demurrer

 

plaintiffs

 

property

 

charity


defendants

 
perpetuam
 

acquaintance

 
mentioned
 
received
 

decision

 

defeat

 

Francis

 

Phillips

 

importance


amount

 

disposition

 

precisely

 

descent

 

complied

 
father
 

beneficiaries

 

representatives

 

attempted

 
bequeath

descended

 

legally

 

lawful

 

alleges

 
speaking
 

dispose

 

lifetime

 
public
 

decease

 

bequest


alleged
 

residue

 

responsibility

 

substantially

 

request

 

control

 

rights

 

called

 

meaning

 
BUTLER