FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464  
465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   >>   >|  
s are authoritative. It is hardly necessary to add that our duty is limited to declaring the law as it is, and that whether any change in that law would be wise or expedient is a question for the legislative and not for the judicial department of the government. Petition dismissed. MARCUS MORTON, _Chief-Justice_, [Signed:] CHARLES DEVENS, WILLIAM E. ENDICOTT, WILLIAM ALLEN, OTIS P. LORD, CHARLES ALLEN, WALBRIDGE A. FIELD. The three preceding decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts against the rights of the women of the commonwealth were as follows: The first decision was in the case of Sarah E. Wall of Worcester, who had refused to pay her taxes under the following protest: Believing with the immortal Declaration of Independence that taxation and representation are inseparable; believing that the constitution of the State furnishes no authority for the taxation of woman; believing also that the constitution of the higher law of God, written on the human soul, requires us, if we would be worthy the rich inheritance of the past and true to ourselves and the future, to yield obedience to no statute that shall tend to fetter its aspirations, I shall henceforth pay no taxes until the word _male_ is stricken from the voting clauses of the constitution of Massachusetts. Worcester _Daily Spy_, October 5, 1858. SARAH E. WALL. Miss Wall was prosecuted by the city collector, and she carried her case before the Supreme Court, where she appeared for herself, W. A. Williams appearing for the collector. In an account of this matter in 1881, Miss Wall says: "Although it was in 1858 that my resistance to taxation commenced, it was not until 1863 that the contest terminated and the decision was rendered. I think the Supreme Court would always find some way to evade a decision on this question." _Wheeler vs. Wall, 6 Allen, 558_: By the constitution of Massachusetts, c. 1, Sec. 1, article 4, the legislature has power to impose taxes upon all the inhabitants of and persons resident, and estates lying within the said commonwealth. By the laws passed by the legislature in pursuance of this power and authority, the defendant is liable to taxation, although she is not qualified to vote for the officers by whom th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464  
465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

taxation

 
constitution
 
decision
 

Massachusetts

 

Supreme

 

commonwealth

 

collector

 

legislature

 

believing

 

WILLIAM


authority

 
Worcester
 

question

 
CHARLES
 
Williams
 

matter

 

appearing

 

account

 

contest

 

terminated


commenced

 

resistance

 

Although

 

appeared

 

limited

 
October
 

voting

 

clauses

 

prosecuted

 
rendered

carried

 

estates

 

resident

 

inhabitants

 
persons
 

passed

 

pursuance

 
officers
 

qualified

 

defendant


liable
 

impose

 

Wheeler

 

article

 

authoritative

 

declaring

 

judicial

 

legislative

 

department

 
government