FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417  
418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   >>   >|  
ealment is what is meant by an ambush which may be lawfully employed in a just war. Nor can these ambushes be properly called deceptions, nor are they contrary to justice or to a well-ordered will. For a man would have an inordinate will if he were unwilling that others should hide anything from him. This suffices for the Replies to the Objections. _______________________ FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 40, Art. 4] Whether It Is Lawful to Fight on Holy Days? Objection 1: It would seem unlawful to fight on holy days. For holy days are instituted that we may give our time to the things of God. Hence they are included in the keeping of the Sabbath prescribed Ex. 20:8: for "sabbath" is interpreted "rest." But wars are full of unrest. Therefore by no means is it lawful to fight on holy days. Obj. 2: Further, certain persons are reproached (Isa. 58:3) because on fast-days they exacted what was owing to them, were guilty of strife, and of smiting with the fist. Much more, therefore, is it unlawful to fight on holy days. Obj. 3: Further, no ill deed should be done to avoid temporal harm. But fighting on a holy day seems in itself to be an ill deed. Therefore no one should fight on a holy day even through the need of avoiding temporal harm. _On the contrary,_ It is written (1 Mac. 2:41): The Jews rightly determined . . . saying: "Whosoever shall come up against us to fight on the Sabbath-day, we will fight against him." _I answer that,_ The observance of holy days is no hindrance to those things which are ordained to man's safety, even that of his body. Hence Our Lord argued with the Jews, saying (John 7:23): "Are you angry at Me because I have healed the whole man on the Sabbath-day?" Hence physicians may lawfully attend to their patients on holy days. Now there is much more reason for safeguarding the common weal (whereby many are saved from being slain, and innumerable evils both temporal and spiritual prevented), than the bodily safety of an individual. Therefore, for the purpose of safeguarding the common weal of the faithful, it is lawful to carry on a war on holy days, provided there be need for doing so: because it would be to tempt God, if notwithstanding such a need, one were to choose to refrain from fighting. However, as soon as the need ceases, it is no longer lawful to fight on a holy day, for the reasons given: wherefore this suffices for the Replies to the Objections. _______________________
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417  
418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

lawful

 

temporal

 

Sabbath

 
Therefore
 

common

 
safeguarding
 

unlawful

 
things
 

Further

 
fighting

safety

 
suffices
 
Replies
 
contrary
 

lawfully

 
Objections
 

choose

 

refrain

 

However

 
answer

observance

 

notwithstanding

 
ordained
 

hindrance

 

rightly

 

wherefore

 

determined

 

Whosoever

 

ceases

 

innumerable


longer

 

reasons

 

purpose

 
physicians
 

attend

 

healed

 
individual
 

bodily

 
prevented
 

patients


provided

 
reason
 

argued

 
faithful
 

spiritual

 

ARTICLE

 
FOURTH
 

Objection

 

Whether

 

Lawful