FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924  
925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   >>   >|  
lace under theft, if one steal a sacred thing. Therefore sacrilege is not a special sin. Obj. 3: Further, every special sin is to found apart from other sins as the Philosopher states, in speaking of special justice (Ethic. v, 11). But, seemingly, sacrilege is not to be found apart from other sins; for it is sometimes united to theft, sometimes to murder, as stated in the preceding objection. Therefore it is not a special sin. _On the contrary,_ That which is opposed to a special virtue is a special sin. But sacrilege is opposed to a special virtue, namely religion, to which it belongs to reverence God and divine things. Therefore sacrilege is a special sin. _I answer that,_ Wherever we find a special aspect of deformity, there must needs be a special sin; because the species of a thing is derived chiefly from its formal aspect, and not from its matter or subject. Now in sacrilege we find a special aspect of deformity, namely, the violation of a sacred thing by treating it irreverently. Hence it is a special sin. Moreover, it is opposed to religion. For according to Damascene (De Fide Orth. iv, 3), "When the purple has been made into a royal robe, we pay it honor and homage, and if anyone dishonor it he is condemned to death," as acting against the king: and in the same way if a man violate a sacred thing, by so doing his behavior is contrary to the reverence due to God and consequently he is guilty of irreligion. Reply Obj. 1: Those are said to sin against the sanctity of the divine law who assail God's law, as heretics and blasphemers do. These are guilty of unbelief, through not believing in God; and of sacrilege, through perverting the words of the divine law. Reply Obj. 2: Nothing prevents one specific kind of sin being found in various generic kinds of sin, inasmuch as various sins are directed to the end of one sin, just as happens in the case of virtues commanded by one virtue. In this way, by whatever kind of sin a man acts counter to reverence due to sacred things, he commits a sacrilege formally; although his act contains various kinds of sin materially. Reply Obj. 3: Sacrilege is sometimes found apart from other sins, through its act having no other deformity than the violation of a sacred thing: for instance, if a judge were to take a person from a sacred place, for he might lawfully have taken him from elsewhere. _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 99, Art. 3] Whether the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   900   901   902   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924  
925   926   927   928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

special

 

sacrilege

 

sacred

 

reverence

 

deformity

 

opposed

 
virtue
 

aspect

 
divine
 

Therefore


guilty

 
violation
 
religion
 
things
 

contrary

 
unbelief
 

heretics

 
blasphemers
 

specific

 

prevents


Nothing
 

perverting

 

believing

 

assail

 

irreligion

 

Whether

 

sanctity

 

ARTICLE

 
lawfully
 

person


commits

 

formally

 

instance

 

Sacrilege

 

materially

 

counter

 

directed

 

generic

 
commanded
 
virtues

purple
 

answer

 
Wherever
 
belongs
 

chiefly

 
formal
 

matter

 

derived

 

species

 
objection