FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829  
830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   >>   >|  
erns does not gainsay it. Reply Obj. 2: As soon as a man comes of age, if he be a freeman he is in his own power in all matters concerning his person, for instance with regard to binding himself by vow to enter religion, or with regard to contracting marriage. But he is not in his own power as regards the arrangements of the household, so that in these matters he cannot vow anything that shall be valid without the consent of his father. A slave, through being in his master's power, even as regards his personal deeds, cannot bind himself by vow to enter religion, since this would withdraw him from his master's service. Reply Obj. 3: A religious is subject to his superior as to his actions connected with his profession of his rule. Wherefore even though one may be able to do something now and then, when one is not being occupied with other things by one's superior, yet since there is no time when his superior cannot occupy him with something, no vow of a religious stands without the consent of his superior, as neither does the vow of a girl while in (her father's) house without his consent; nor of a wife, without the consent of her husband. Reply Obj. 4: Although the vow of one who is subject to another's power does not stand without the consent of the one to whom he is subject, he does not sin by vowing; because his vow is understood to contain the requisite condition, providing, namely, that his superior approve or do not gainsay it. _______________________ NINTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 88, Art. 9] Whether Children Can Bind Themselves by Vow to Enter Religion? Objection 1: It would seem that children cannot bind themselves by vow to enter religion. Since a vow requires deliberation of the mind, it is fitting that those alone should vow who have the use of reason. But this is lacking in children just as in imbeciles and madmen. Therefore just as imbeciles and madmen cannot bind themselves to anything by vow, so neither, seemingly, can children bind themselves by vow to enter religion. Obj. 2: Further, that which can be validly done by one cannot be annulled by another. Now a vow to enter religion made by a boy or girl before the age of puberty can be revoked by the parents or guardian (20, qu. ii, cap. Puella). Therefore it seems that a boy or girl cannot validly make a vow before the age of fourteen. Obj. 3: Further, according to the rule of Blessed Benedict [*Ch. 58] and a statute of Innocent IV, a year
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829  
830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

religion

 

superior

 

consent

 

subject

 

children

 

validly

 
madmen
 

Therefore

 
master
 

imbeciles


Further

 
religious
 
matters
 
regard
 

father

 
gainsay
 

Blessed

 
Benedict
 

fourteen

 

deliberation


requires
 

Themselves

 

Children

 

Whether

 

Objection

 

fitting

 

Religion

 

reason

 
guardian
 

seemingly


annulled

 

parents

 

puberty

 

revoked

 

lacking

 

Puella

 

Innocent

 

statute

 
things
 
personal

household
 

withdraw

 
profession
 
Wherefore
 

connected

 
actions
 

service

 

arrangements

 

marriage

 
freeman