FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792  
793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   >>   >|  
atural reason that man should use certain sensibles, by offering them to God in sign of the subjection and honor due to Him, like those who make certain offerings to their lord in recognition of his authority. Now this is what we mean by a sacrifice, and consequently the offering of sacrifice is of the natural law. Reply Obj. 1: As stated above (I-II, Q. 95, A. 2), certain things belong generically to the natural law, while their determination belongs to the positive law; thus the natural law requires that evildoers should be punished; but that this or that punishment should be inflicted on them is a matter determined by God or by man. In like manner the offering of sacrifice belongs generically to the natural law, and consequently all are agreed on this point, but the determination of sacrifices is established by God or by man, and this is the reason for their difference. Reply Obj. 2: Adam, Isaac and other just men offered sacrifice to God in a manner befitting the times in which they lived, according to Gregory, who says (Moral. iv, 3) that in olden times original sin was remitted through the offering of sacrifices. Nor does Scripture mention all the sacrifices of the just, but only those that have something special connected with them. Perhaps the reason why we read of no sacrifice being offered by Adam may be that, as the origin of sin is ascribed to him, the origin of sanctification ought not to be represented as typified in him. Isaac was a type of Christ, being himself offered in sacrifice; and so there was no need that he should be represented as offering a sacrifice. Reply Obj. 3: It is natural to man to express his ideas by signs, but the determination of those signs depends on man's pleasure. _______________________ SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 85, Art. 2] Whether Sacrifice Should Be Offered to God Alone? Objection 1: It would seem that sacrifice should not be offered to the most high God alone. Since sacrifice ought to be offered to God, it would seem that it ought to be offered to all such as are partakers of the Godhead. Now holy men are made "partakers of the Divine nature," according to 2 Pet. 1:4; wherefore of them is it written (Ps. 81:6): "I have said, You are gods": and angels too are called "sons of God," according to Job 1:6. Thus sacrifice should be offered to all these. Obj. 2: Further, the greater a person is the greater the honor due to him from man. Now the angels and sain
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792  
793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sacrifice

 

offered

 

offering

 

natural

 

sacrifices

 

determination

 
reason
 

belongs

 
manner
 

greater


origin

 
partakers
 
represented
 
generically
 

angels

 
Whether
 

Should

 
Sacrifice
 

express

 

Christ


typified
 

pleasure

 

SECOND

 

depends

 

ARTICLE

 

atural

 

called

 

person

 
Further
 

written


wherefore

 

Objection

 

Godhead

 

nature

 

Divine

 

Offered

 

special

 

inflicted

 
punishment
 
punished

requires
 

evildoers

 
matter
 
determined
 

established

 
subjection
 

agreed

 

positive

 

stated

 
recognition