FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201  
202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   >>   >|  
responsible colonies. The first of these forms is open to the objection, that it perpetuates those struggles between English executive measures and Irish opinion which has made Ireland for centuries ungovernable, and led to the establishment of the union and destruction of Irish independence in 1800; the second proposal would destroy the fiscal unity of the empire--leave the agrarian feud unextinguished, and aggravate the objections which have been urged against the Home Rule Bill of 1886. A question still remains, in relation to the _form_ of the Home Rule Bill of 1886, which would not have deserved attention but for the prominence given to it in some of the discussions upon the subject. The Bill of 1886 provides "that the Legislature may make laws for the peace, order, and good government of Ireland," but subjects their power to numerous exceptions and restrictions. The Act establishing the Dominion of Canada enumerates various matters in respect of which the Legislature of Canada is to have exclusive power, but prefaces the enumeration with a clause "that the Dominion Legislature may make laws for the peace, order, and good government of Canada in relation to all matters not within the jurisdiction of the provincial Legislatures, although such matters may not be specially mentioned." In effect, therefore, the difference between the Irish Bill and the Canadian Act is one of expression and not of substance, and, although the Bill is more accurate in its form, it would scarcely be worth while to insist on legislating by exception instead of by enumeration if, by the substitution of the latter form for the former, any material opposition would be conciliated. What, then, are the conclusions intended to be drawn from the foregoing premises? 1. That coercion is played out, and can no longer be regarded as a remedy for the evils of Irish misrule. 2. That some alternative must be found, and that the only alternative within the range of practical politics is some form of Home Rule. 3. That there is no reason for thinking that the grant of Home Rule to Ireland--a member only, and not one of the most important members, of the British Empire--will in any way dismember, or even in the slightest degree risk the dismemberment of the Empire. 4. That Home Rule presupposes and admits the supremacy of the British Parliament. 5. That theory is in favour of Home Rule, as the nationality of Ireland is distinct, and justifies
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201  
202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ireland

 

Canada

 

Legislature

 

matters

 
relation
 
Empire
 

British

 

alternative

 

Dominion

 

government


enumeration

 
objection
 

coercion

 

played

 
premises
 

foregoing

 
misrule
 
remedy
 
longer
 

regarded


conclusions

 

substitution

 
exception
 

legislating

 

perpetuates

 
conciliated
 

material

 

opposition

 
intended
 
dismemberment

presupposes
 

degree

 
slightest
 
admits
 

supremacy

 

nationality

 

distinct

 

justifies

 
favour
 

theory


Parliament

 
dismember
 

reason

 

politics

 

practical

 

thinking

 

colonies

 

responsible

 

members

 

important