FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64  
65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   >>   >|  
hey all agreed that he was effectually stripped of power. _Yet the legislative power had not been taken from him; but only the power to enforce his laws, unless juries should freely consent to their enforcement._] [Footnote 14: The laws were, at that time, all written in Latin.] [Footnote 15: "No man shall be condemned at the king's suit, either before the king in his bench, where pleas are _coram rege_, (before the king,) (and so are the words _nec super eum ibimus_, to be understood,) nor before any other commissioner or judge whatsoever, and so are the words _nec super eum mittemus_, to be understood, but by the judgment of his peers, that is, equals, or according to the law of the land."--_2 Coke's Inst._, 46.] [Footnote 16: Perhaps the assertion in the text should be made with this qualification--that the words "_per legem terrae_," (according to the law of the land,) and the words "_per legale judicium parium suorum_," (according to the _legal_ judgment of his peers,) imply that the king, before proceeding to any _executive_ action, will take notice of "the law of the land," and of the _legality_ of the judgment of the peers, and will _execute_ upon the prisoner nothing except what the law of the land authorizes, and no judgments of the peers, except _legal_ ones. With this qualification, the assertion in the text is strictly correct--that there is nothing in the whole chapter that grants to the king, or his judges, any _judicial_ power at all. The chapter only describes and _limits_ his _executive_ power.] [Footnote 17: See Blackstone's Law Tracts, page 294, Oxford Edition.] [Footnote 18: These Articles of the Charter are given in Blackstone's collection of Charters, and are also printed with the _Statutes of the Realm_. Also in Wilkins' Laws of the Anglo-Saxons, p. 356.] [Footnote 19: Lingard says, "The words, '_We will not destroy him, nor will we go upon him, nor will we send upon him_,' have been very differently expounded by different legal authorities. Their real meaning may be learned from John himself, who the next year promised by his letters patent ... nec super eos _per vim vel per arma_ ibimus, nisi per legem regni nostri, vel per judicium parium suorum in curia nostra, (nor will we go upon them _by force or by arms_, unless by the law of our kingdom, or the judgment of their peers in our court.) Pat. 16 Johan, apud Drad. 11, app. no. 124. He had hitherto been in the habit of _going_ with
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64  
65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

judgment

 

understood

 
ibimus
 

chapter

 

Blackstone

 

suorum

 
assertion
 

qualification

 

parium


judicium

 

executive

 
destroy
 

differently

 

expounded

 
authorities
 

Charters

 

printed

 

Statutes

 

collection


Articles
 

Charter

 
Lingard
 

Saxons

 

Wilkins

 

meaning

 

learned

 

kingdom

 
hitherto
 

nostra


promised
 

letters

 

patent

 

nostri

 
agreed
 

equals

 

enforcement

 

juries

 
terrae
 

legale


freely

 

Perhaps

 

consent

 

written

 
condemned
 

mittemus

 

whatsoever

 

commissioner

 
enforce
 

judges