FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185  
186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>   >|  
rophetic, as the later peace movement showed, in seeking a motive for the _U-53's_ proceedings. It considered that Germany sought to force the United States to propose peace terms, regardless of whether the Entente Allies were agreeable or not: "Thus, with unrestricted submarine warfare as a settled policy, Germany gives America warning of what is likely to happen unless the United States is prepared to declare that the war has reached a point where it is dangerous for neutrals. If the United States is willing to play this role, the Germans will hold their hands from an extra dose of unlimited submarine frightfulness." The _U-53_ had no sooner gone when an exchange of communications between the American and Allied governments regarding the status of foreign submarines in neutral ports became public. The question related to the hospitality accorded the _Deutschland_ in Baltimore and New London; but as it arose in the midst of the hubbub occasioned by the _U-53_, the American view appeared to determine that such craft could call at an American port like any other armed vessel, so long as it did not stay beyond the allotted time. The Allied governments besought neutrals, the United States among them, to forbid belligerent submarine vessels, "whatever the purpose to which they are put," from making use of neutral waters, roadsteads, and ports. Such craft could navigate and remain at sea submerged, could escape control and observation, avoid identification and having their national character established to determine whether they were neutral or belligerent, combatant or noncombatant. The capacity for harm inherent in the nature of such vessels therefore required, in the view of the Allied governments, that they should be excluded from the benefit of rules hitherto recognized by the laws of nations governing the admission of war or merchant vessels to neutral waters and their sojourn in them. Hence if any belligerent submarine entered a neutral port it should be interned. The point was further made that grave danger was incurred by neutral submarines in the navigation of regions frequented by belligerent submarines. The American answer was brusque, and resentful of the attempt of the Allies to dictate the attitude neutrals should take toward submarines which visited their harbors. The governments of France, Great Britain, Russia, and Japan were informed that they had not "set forth any circumstances, nor is the Gover
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185  
186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
neutral
 

States

 

United

 

governments

 

American

 

submarines

 

submarine

 

belligerent

 

neutrals

 
Allied

vessels

 

waters

 

Germany

 

determine

 

Allies

 

national

 

established

 
combatant
 
noncombatant
 
besought

forbid

 

character

 

making

 

capacity

 

purpose

 

roadsteads

 

control

 

observation

 
escape
 

submerged


navigate
 
remain
 

identification

 
attitude
 
dictate
 
visited
 

attempt

 

resentful

 
regions
 
frequented

answer
 

brusque

 

harbors

 
France
 
circumstances
 

informed

 

Britain

 

Russia

 

navigation

 

incurred