FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  
in any way shocking the American people. Nothing has come from Berlin that indicates any feeling of guilt on the part of the German people or their Government. "In the United States, on the contrary, the act is regarded as one of the blackest crimes of history. And yet, in spite of that feeling, we have waited patiently for ten months in the hope that the German Government would do justice, and clear its name of reproach. Yet now we are told that it is Germany that has shown a 'patient attitude,' the implication or insinuation being that our long suffering administration has been unreasonable and impatient. That will not be the verdict of history, as it is not the verdict of our own people. We have made every allowance for the conditions existing in Germany, and have resolutely refused to take advantage of her distress. We doubt whether there is any other government in the world that would have shown the patience and moderation, under like provocation, that have been shown by the American Government in these _Lusitania_ negotiations." I sent the editorial to von Jagow, who returned it the next day with the brief comment on one of his calling cards: "With many thanks." About this time Count Reventlow and the other naval writers began to refer to everything President Wilson did as a "bluff." When Col. E. M. House came to Berlin early in 1916, he tried to impress the officials with the fact that Mr. Wilson was not only not bluffing, but that the American people would support him in whatever he did in dealing with the German Government. Mr. Gerard tried too to impress the Foreign Office but because he could only deal with that branch of the Government, he could not change the Navy's impression, which was that Wilson would never take a definite stand against Germany. On the 8th of February, the _London Times_ printed the following despatch which I had sent to the United States: "Mr. Gerard has been accused of not being forceful enough in dealing with the Berlin Foreign Office. In Berlin he has been criticised for just the opposite. It has been stated frequently that he was too aggressive. The Ambassador's position was that he must carry out Mr. Wilson's ideas. So he tried for days and weeks to impress officials with the seriousness of the situation. At the critical point in the negotiations various unofficial diplomats began to arrive and they seriously interfered with negotiations. One of these wa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75  
76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Government
 

Wilson

 

Berlin

 

people

 

Germany

 

negotiations

 
impress
 
American
 
German
 

Foreign


verdict

 

Office

 

dealing

 
officials
 

Gerard

 

States

 

history

 

United

 

feeling

 

branch


change

 

Nothing

 

shocking

 

impression

 
February
 

definite

 

contrary

 

reproach

 
support
 

bluffing


London

 

situation

 
critical
 

seriousness

 
interfered
 

unofficial

 

diplomats

 

arrive

 
forceful
 

criticised


accused
 
printed
 

despatch

 

opposite

 

Ambassador

 

position

 
aggressive
 

stated

 

frequently

 

waited